CVE-2026-98072

net/rds: use wq_has_sleeper() in release_in_xmit()

N/A
Published: September 25, 2026 at 10:24 AM UTC
Updated: October 19, 2026 at 10:18 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: use wq_has_sleeper() in release_in_xmit() release_in_xmit() clears RDS_IN_XMIT with clear_bit_unlock() and then checks waitqueue_active() to decide whether anyone needs waking. clear_bit_unlock() is only a release operation: it orders the critical section before the bit clear, but does not order the subsequent plain load of the wait queue head after it. The waiter side does the mirror image - it adds itself to the wait queue and then tests the bit. That is the classic store-buffering pattern: the releasing CPU can read the wait queue as empty while the waiting CPU still reads the bit as set, so the sleeper is never woken. The waiters are rds_conn_shutdown() and rds_tcp_reset_callbacks(), both in uninterruptible wait_event() with no timeout. A lost wake-up strands the shutdown worker on its single-threaded workqueue until some other sender releases the bit again - and on a connection that is being torn down precisely because it failed, there may never be another sender. The barrier used to be there: release_in_xmit() did clear_bit() followed by smp_mb__after_atomic() until commit 1422f28826d2 ("rds: introduce acquire/release ordering in acquire/release_in_xmit()") folded both into clear_bit_unlock(), which strengthened the lock hand-off but silently dropped the full barrier the wake-up check depends on. The refill counterpart, release_refill() in net/rds/ib_recv.c, still carries its smp_mb__after_atomic() for exactly this reason. Use wq_has_sleeper(), which is waitqueue_active() preceded by the required full barrier.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

1422f28826d2a0c11e5240b3e951c9e214d8656e1e1e4316fcaeb9cd6bc56c91127e88625237dd444.19.3114a4dffdff9ea6201665f5d0a5042011d09bd527f5.10.2145.15.1535.4.27352287ed416a10bc3d3e204a3186d9509ab3ee6346.1.836.6.236.7.116.8.26.98c378cc522aedd5fa5aa53486b43a4d552fbbd5c917135195200e20e5244b9c3f2bb40f3d5e02510bec6c4ce1169a565c58c347d5d0ac22e46d507d6d792459a6e2ae21c7f5107babd63e52e4c5ab93af781fb5177cdfd9a6c98cd94e30275457c6461ac
Vendor states this is fixed in 3764627b30a283e611e652c4a2bb8cdc74a75a99 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 3d401934b7edb3ccb07d982dabadd04c45ee307c (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5a806ed1eb46850ca4159a18b2a8c4b70f0c1341 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6d0c8b7073913011459cf968cbbadd341e166bc3 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6f552364d97cf4005c7a58f11c9f79e14e269865 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in a269795107f45adc95975a83324f8fef40bec4ce (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in a94b1dfc82454c5bc068e71c25393af674daf63b (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in ed7ee0cd0e136d02f87f13181b1a89880463c7e9 (fixed)
Affected range stops below 4.20, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.271 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.222 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 5.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.189 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.111 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.53 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.158 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 6.8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.9 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.2.7 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.3 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.3-rc2 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

Quick Info

StatusUNDERGOING ANALYSIS

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card