CVE-2026-9033

Unauthenticated Captive Portal Session Termination and Forced Logout in Omada Gateways

MEDIUM
4.3
CVSS Score
Published: August 20, 2026 at 06:31 PM UTC
Updated: October 26, 2026 at 10:10 AM UTC
36 products affected across 1 vendorER7212PC FirmwareEr707-m2 FirmwareER706W 4G Firmware· also runs on 18 platforms

Using ER7212PC v2 by TP-Link Systems Inc.?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect ER7212PC v2 - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.3
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the captive portal service of an affected device can terminate active captive portal sessions, including forcing logout of specific users or clearing all active sessions. Affected users must re-authenticate to regain access. Successful exploitation may allow termination of individual or all active captive portal sessions, causing temporary service disruption and requiring users to re-authenticate.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 1.0.1
Affected range stops below 1.0.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-dr3150 (same device)
v < 1.2.0
Affected range stops below 1.2.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-dr3220v-4g (same device)
v < 1.2.0
Affected range stops below 1.2.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-dr3650v-4g (same device)
v < 1.2.0
Affected range stops below 1.2.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-dr3650v (same device)
v < 1.0.2
Affected range stops below 1.0.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-er603wp-4g-outdoor (same device)
v < 2.4.4
Affected range stops below 2.4.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-er605 (same device)
v < 2.0.4
Affected range stops below 2.0.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-er605w (same device)
v < 1.0.3
Affected range stops below 1.0.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-er701-5g-outdoor (same device)
v < 1.1.7
Affected range stops below 1.1.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-er703wp-4g-outdoor (same device)
v < 1.2.6v < 2.1.11
Affected range stops below 1.2.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.1.11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
tp-link-er706w-4g (same device)

Runs on — not affected

The affected product only carries this flaw when running on these platforms. The platforms themselves are not vulnerable.

Affected range stops below 1.0.1 Build 20260722 Rel.16854, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.2.0 Build 20260630 Rel.82652, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.2.0 Build 20260630 Rel.83311, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.2.0 Build 20260630 Rel.83347, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.0.2 Build 20260723 Rel.43271, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.4.4 Build 20260630 Rel.14398, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.0.4 Build 20260723 Rel.43763, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.0.3 Build 20260723 Rel.40931, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.1.7 Build 20260723 Rel.41712, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.2.11 Build 20260723 Rel.41567, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (3)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
ADJACENT_NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
LOW
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-306

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card