CVE-2026-90307

RDMA/srp: fix heap information leak on a truncated SRP_CRED_REQ

N/A
Published: September 17, 2026 at 04:08 PM UTC
Updated: October 19, 2026 at 09:19 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/srp: fix heap information leak on a truncated SRP_CRED_REQ srp_recv_done() passes wc->byte_len to srp_process_rsp(). It passes nothing to srp_process_cred_req() and srp_process_aer_req(), which read fixed-size fields from the receive buffer without checking that those fields were received. The buffer size is max_ti_iu_len, which comes from the login response and is not validated. A target that advertises 8 and then sends an 8-byte SRP_CRED_REQ makes the initiator read req->tag from beyond the end of the buffer. req->tag is copied into the SRP_CRED_RSP and sent back, so those bytes reach the target. SRP_AER_REQ behaves the same way and also reads req->lun. The leak is 8 bytes per response. max_ti_iu_len also decides which slab cache the buffer comes from. With 8 the buffer is a kmalloc-8 object and the read is entirely outside it: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in srp_recv_done+0x172b/0x1aa0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888104714da8 by task kworker/u8:3/50 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 8-byte region [ffff888104714da0, ffff888104714da8) Without KASAN the returned bytes are whatever is next in the slab. One run returned ".strtab". rsp->data[3] in srp_process_rsp() has the same problem: only resp_data_len is checked before it is read. Drop a request that is shorter than the structure being parsed, and check byte_len before the tsk_mgmt read.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

2.6.37bb12588a38e6db85e01dceadff7bc161fc92e7d2
Vendor states this is fixed in 001adf2fe87d1ab677c014a97467bbea5153ae5f (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0e7ba617514902501514d577647d866e670dad90 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 138eb2f0ef02adfe6ad126afad5b54c56b5046ee (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 3787f4c3e0d813d6c56be9f6dfaf66f8551fb0a7 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 3f7fdf561f1ec3b523c39708df00bd808671668d (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 961ac0f0c5e414abdd6b33fae84b311d9fde0bd0 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in dc2272c00d7c00ee2a69b57f7ca9caaefcbdb8cd (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in fa1b33fdab3e79dce83721ead3220200a2dbec22 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 2.6.37 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.270 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.221 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.188 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.110 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.52 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.157 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.2.6 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.3 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.3-rc1 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

Quick Info

StatusRECEIVED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card