CVE-2026-89796

mm/damon/core: avoid infinite kdamond_merge_regions() internal loop

N/A
Published: September 16, 2026 at 10:30 AM UTC
Updated: October 19, 2026 at 09:18 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/core: avoid infinite kdamond_merge_regions() internal loop Patch series "mm/damon: unurgent fixes for infinite loop, NULL de-ref and races", v1.1. Sashiko found a few issues in DAMON that could cause infinite loop, NULL dereference and monitoring results degradation. The first two sounds scary but the infinite loop happens only under unreasonable user setup. The NULL dereference is only in a unit test. Monitoring results degradation is trivial since it is only best-effort, and those happens from only unlikely races. Still those are bugs that better to fix if possible. Fix those. This patch (of 6): Due to online parameter update like events, the number of DAMON regions could be higher than the user-set upper limit. kdamond_merge_regions() repeats merge regions until the number meets the limit, while doubling the merge threshold up to the theoretical maximum threshold. It is tried only up to the theoretical maximum threshold because even the aggressive merging can fail from reducing the number of regions under the user-defined upper limit. For example, there could be many user-defined non-contiguous regions that cannot be merged. The threshold based loop break condition is evaluated by comparing the threshold for the next merging try against the theoretical maximum threshold. If max_thres is larger than UINT_MAX / 2, doubling the threshold could make it overflow, and bypass the loop break condition. In the case, if the number of regions cannot be reduced under the upper limit like explained above, the loop will run infinitely. Prevent the case by doing the break condition check before doubling the threshold. Also, prevent the threshold exceeding the maximum threshold, as it could overflow and apply the wrong merge threshold. This issue is unlikely to occur in real world, since having the max_thres higher than UINT_MAX / 2 require unrealistically large aggregation intervals compared to the sampling interval. Also, it requires an unrealistically large number of uncontiguous regions setup. Nonetheless, the consequence is bad and the fix is simple. The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

11078e2d11465518a9e85096bd28f8cd5fa1ea411e865019cef354a5f0314491b4b4fc9f9a613642310d6c15e9104c99d5d9d0ff8e5383a79da7d5e65.15.1646.1.1016.106.6.416.9.10d7eda72e59bbf3ed592db7ff0fd8c246c73149a8f2bd3184b6aeca6a497394b558337246e09fc02d
Vendor states this is fixed in 123e4619ab6c8ab1c4cb1d7a58311a2af13929cd (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 407da1dd7f48e5ba22ceb8834f6923390632d025 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 50a7a5aec1aa43efc297fd4377c1cbdc7d15620d (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5b0953f86d65855dc901050f40bbe6da0475d198 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 65edd8b3a88278c9f8e5c7d8c15d4f296ce35078 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 769c16699c89811386eb003c8fd9dcb8d405b316 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8a96a06e04d210845be5d9581c0e9e338947e8f8 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.222 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.189 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.10 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.111 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.53 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.158 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.2.5 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.3 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.3-rc1 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

Quick Info

StatusRECEIVED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card