CVE-2026-80731

net: remove CAP_SYS_RAWIO zero-padding in dev_validate_header

HIGH
7.8
CVSS Score
Published: September 3, 2026 at 08:21 AM UTC
Updated: October 16, 2026 at 08:18 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.1%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: remove CAP_SYS_RAWIO zero-padding in dev_validate_header dev_validate_header() reads dev->hard_header_len directly when zero-padding short link layer headers for CAP_SYS_RAWIO holders: if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) { memset(ll_header + len, 0, dev->hard_header_len - len); return true; } Packet send paths call dev_validate_header() on skbs whose headroom was allocated from an earlier hard_header_len read. If the device is reconfigured so that dev->hard_header_len increases before validation, the memset writes past the reserved buffer, an out-of-bounds write. This out-of-bounds write is masked in some SOCK_RAW paths today because the same concurrent increase can first make skb_push() exceed the reserved headroom and trigger skb_under_panic(). Remove the zero-padding branch before making those hard_header_len reads consistent, so the snapshot fixes do not turn a loud panic into a silent overwrite. This path is only reached for variable length L2 protocols, where len < hard_header_len but len >= min_header_len. No remaining in-tree variable length L2 protocol implements header_ops->validate, and the CAP_SYS_RAWIO bypass that zero-pads and accepts short headers has no real value beyond allowing testing of intentionally malformed input. Drop the CAP_SYS_RAWIO branch. The remaining reads of dev->hard_header_len in dev_validate_header() are comparisons only and have no memory safety impact.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

1df16498dfd0d5a129bdf2982d9a08df73e8923d2793a23aacbd754dbbb5cb75093deb7e4103bace3.16.363.2.804.1.284.4.84.5.24.66804052fa9d86e9a512c88b24a5debbfc1a490fc8b8d278aa4de9335682bbd4a3bb619af015c859eb5518429e70cd783b8ca52335456172c1a0589f6f58a6c08ebdfa978178bbca78c2ba744a2665912
Vendor states this is fixed in 3b9a324e646d3657a8d9806dfbfe4f3e4066e882 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 53fd7f912c0877647d6a1e1877f5ea8535ee0b4a (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 74e035f07f53feca09e2352e77fccb09cad5e208 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8fc9816404166a90ed8d544dc52482fafffb6d9f (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 99df6b7a713f96eda206680d100b76e15f9d9b69 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in b0f92a5731dc82556a9ae005cc35f71ab136307b (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in dbb30dc943a93e083f1e531bfdc6779e57de40d0 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in fa6d98dd925e72fc028b26a0cbbff9d2f0601ff6 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in fc902f52a02298c7432b2334c0c82a2885a1a8b6 (fixed)
Affected range stops below 3.17, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 3.2.81 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 4.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 4.6 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.265 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.216 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.183 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.104 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.45 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.152 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.1.9 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.2 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.8HIGHLinux
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusRECEIVED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card