CVE-2026-80659

mmc: vub300: defer reset until cmd_mutex is unlocked

N/A
Published: August 28, 2026 at 06:49 AM UTC
Updated: August 28, 2026 at 08:32 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mmc: vub300: defer reset until cmd_mutex is unlocked vub300_cmndwork_thread() holds cmd_mutex while it sends a command and waits for the command response. If the response wait times out, __vub300_command_response() kills the command URBs and then synchronously resets the USB device through usb_reset_device(). That reset path re-enters the driver through vub300_pre_reset(), which also takes cmd_mutex. The worker therefore tries to acquire the same mutex recursively while it is still holding it from the command path. This issue was found by our static analysis tool and then manually reviewed against the current tree. The grounded PoC kept the real worker and timeout/reset carrier: vub300_cmndwork_thread() __vub300_command_response() usb_lock_device_for_reset() usb_reset_device() vub300_pre_reset() Lockdep reported the same-task recursive acquisition on cmd_mutex: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected ... (&test_vub300.cmd_mutex) ... at: usb_reset_device... [vuln_msv] ... (&test_vub300.cmd_mutex) ... at: vub300_cmndwork_thread+0x12/0x20 [vuln_msv] Workqueue: vub300_cmd_wq vub300_cmndwork_thread [vuln_msv] *** DEADLOCK *** Return a flag from __vub300_command_response() when the timeout path needs a device reset, then perform the reset after vub300_cmndwork_thread() has cleared the in-flight command state and dropped cmd_mutex. The reset is still attempted before mmc_request_done(), preserving the existing request completion ordering while avoiding the recursive lock.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

3.0 ≤ v < 5.10.2613.0 ≤ v < 5.15.2123.0 ≤ v < 6.1.1783.0 ≤ v < 6.12.973.0 ≤ v < 6.18.403.0 ≤ v < 6.6.1453.0 ≤ v < 7.1.53.0 ≤ v < 7.23.088095e7b473a3d9ec3b9c60429576e9cbd327c89
Vendor states this is fixed in 2e6b9a394206c76dd417c991312f349435ef35e6 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7ee7a77ec2f446109ab52cc80ace7acc22ab6211 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8344611477c9241f45f20981990780fc5f0996f8 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8672b8bdbd2063b3fcbd75f729e4706fcdad2257 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 9f5e04235a0b59e6e30af9f45511addf2604d757 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in bf9848a22a8e50d39d5e8d871581f0a8110f16b3 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in c2e1d33929565fa14c48d8a5a45edc3ebfc941b2 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in ee5fb641c4ccac8406c668d3e947eb20ce44f233 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 3.0 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.261 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.212 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.178 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.97 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.40 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.145 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.1.5 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.2 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

Quick Info

StatusRECEIVED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card