CVE-2026-80430

Improper link resolution in the kitty drag and drop protocol allows a client to create files outside the staging directory

MEDIUM
4.6
CVSS Score
Published: September 25, 2026 at 01:08 PM UTC
Updated: September 29, 2026 at 09:32 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorKitty

Using kitty by Kovid Goyal?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect kitty - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.6
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Improper Link Resolution Before File Access in the drag source staging path of the drag and drop protocol in kitty from 0.47.0 before 0.49.0 allows a program writing to the terminal to create files and directories at paths outside the staging directory, because subdir_data_for_drag() in kitty/dnd.c resolves a descendant of the staged item tree by constructing a path string and opening it with safe_open(path, O_DIRECTORY | O_RDONLY, 0) rather than by walking the tree one component at a time, so a client that declares two entries with the same name, the first a symlink whose target is an arbitrary absolute path and the second a directory, causes mkdirat() to fail with EEXIST, which the code ignores, and causes the subsequent path resolution to follow the symlink and return a directory descriptor outside the staging directory, which is then passed as the dirfd argument to add_payload() and used for every further create operation on that item and its descendants. Entry names are sanitised against path separators and dot components, but symlink targets are not validated. Files are created with O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_EXCL at mode 0644, so existing files cannot be overwritten, and directories are created with mkdirat() at mode 0755, so the attacker can create intermediate directories that did not previously exist. This results in the creation of files and directories at any path writable by the user running kitty, provided the symlink target is an existing directory.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

0.47.0 ≤ v < 0.49.00.47.0
Affected range stops below 0.49.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

4.6MEDIUMSecur0
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusAWAITING ANALYSIS
CWE
CWE-59

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card