CVE-2026-76234

libcrux before 0.0.6 Cryptographic Implementation Bug Fixes

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: August 19, 2026 at 02:02 PM UTC
Updated: October 27, 2026 at 01:10 PM UTC
3 products affected across 1 vendorLibcrux EcdhLibcrux ED25519Libcrux Psq

Using libcrux by celabshq?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect libcrux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

libcrux-ecdh and libcrux-ed25519 before 0.0.6, and libcrux-psq before 0.0.7, contain cryptographic implementation bugs. libcrux-ecdh did not properly check length and clamping during X25519 secret validation (and had a broken clamping check for imported X25519 secret keys); libcrux-ed25519 performed a duplicated clamping step during key generation; and libcrux-psq panicked instead of propagating an AEADError. These were fixed in the respective patched releases.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 0.0.6
Vendor states this is fixed in 0.0.6 (unaffected)
v < 0.0.6
Vendor states this is fixed in 0.0.6 (unaffected)
v < 0.0.7
Vendor states this is fixed in 0.0.7 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.5HIGHVulnCheck
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED
CWE
CWE-347

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card