CVE-2026-74598

ipv6: fix Route Information option length validation

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: August 22, 2026 at 03:31 PM UTC
Updated: October 16, 2026 at 08:17 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.4%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: fix Route Information option length validation rt6_route_rcv() validates the Route Information option (RFC 4191) length against the prefix length, but both checks are off by one. rinfo->length is the ND option length in units of 8 octets and it *includes* the 8-byte option header, so an option carrying N bytes of prefix has length == 1 + N/8. RFC 4191 section 2.3 requires length 3 when Prefix Length is greater than 64, and 2 or 3 when it is greater than 0. The code accepts length >= 2 and length >= 1 respectively. ipv6_addr_prefix() then copies prefix_len/8 bytes out of rinfo->prefix, so a Router Advertisement with (prefix_len=128, length=2) or (prefix_len=64, length=1) makes the kernel read up to 8 bytes past the end of the option. Those bytes end up in the prefix of the route that gets installed, so they are visible to userspace: # RA with a Route Information option (prefix_len=128, length=2) # followed by a source link-layer address option, 01 01 de ad be ef ca fe $ ip -6 route show 2001:db8:dead:beef:101:dead:beef:cafe via fe80::1234 dev veth0 proto ra ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the next option, read out of bounds When the Route Information option is the last one in the packet, those eight bytes come from the skb tail room instead. Reject the option lengths RFC 4191 does not allow.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

2.6.1770ceb4f53929f73746be72f73707cd9f8753e2fc
Vendor states this is fixed in 0b9e02f3bd31c888f2ccdc0ca08e546d6abe9c4d (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 2f6f94eda12430fb41b24b44a71e2ea4e93561d7 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 3b2231e358d26e3aec5d8040b1fb777af03c5f05 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7309529f257ae18e72112ef9f614edfd6df229bb (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7eac87396c44a312be457ef41d4c5687883be9a2 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in d1ad8fb2ac6a1afb71dc22d9ae8efb4dda96c824 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in da64ed1f346ba84df574d6469fa2e422b2511719 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in ff3cb05289b8a4ef95fa7ea14c7d34818359edbb (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 2.6.17 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.265 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.216 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.183 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.104 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.45 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.152 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.1.9 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.2 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.5HIGHLinux
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusRECEIVED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card