CVE-2026-74284

net/sched: sch_hfsc: Don't make class passive twice

N/A
Published: August 15, 2026 at 05:57 AM UTC
Updated: August 17, 2026 at 06:19 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: sch_hfsc: Don't make class passive twice update_vf() is called from two places for the same class during a single dequeue when the class's child qdisc (e.g. codel/fq_codel) drops its last packets while dequeuing: 1. The child calls qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog(), which, now that the child is empty, invokes hfsc_qlen_notify() -> update_vf(cl, 0, 0) and turns the class passive (cl_nactive is decremented up the hierarchy). 2. hfsc_dequeue() then calls update_vf(cl, qdisc_pkt_len(skb), cur_time) to charge the dequeued bytes. On the second call the class is already passive, but its child qdisc is still empty, so update_vf() arms go_passive again: if (cl->qdisc->q.qlen == 0 && cl->cl_flags & HFSC_FSC) go_passive = 1; The leaf is then skipped by the cl_nactive == 0 check inside the loop, which does not clear go_passive, so the stale go_passive propagates to the parent and decrements its cl_nactive a second time. A parent that still has other active children is driven to cl_nactive == 0 and removed from the vttree, even though those siblings are still backlogged. They are never dequeued again and the qdisc stalls. Fix this by only arming go_passive when the class is actually active, so an already-passive class no longer triggers a second passive transition. The byte accounting (cl->cl_total += len) still runs for every ancestor, so dequeued bytes continue to be counted exactly once.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v ≥ 5.4.297v ≥ 6.14.65.10.241 ≤ v < 5.10.2615.15.190 ≤ v < 5.15.2125.4.297 ≤ v < 5.56.1.138 ≤ v < 6.1.1786.12.28 ≤ v < 6.12.976.14.6 ≤ v < 6.156.15 ≤ v < 6.18.406.15 ≤ v < 7.1.56.15 ≤ v < 7.26.6.90 ≤ v < 6.6.145475c85426b18eccdcb7f9fb58d8f8e9c6c58c875.10.2415.15.1905.4.29751eb3b65544c9efd6a1026889ee5fb5aa62da3bb6.1.1386.12.286.14.66.156.6.9072c61ffbeeb8c50f6d4d70c65d3283aa1bac57a79030a91235ae4845ec71902c3e0cecfc9ed1f2df9a5fd5c2f4d4afdd5e405083ee53e0789ce76956a5efc95a33bd4fcb879250852828cc58c7862970c1175c4ad01dbc9c979d099861fa90a754f72059d06476714d2819b550e0cc39222347e2c8941c9d
Vendor states this is fixed in 15720cd8fa3fc625146128f89a8e11b0449a20a7 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 3a49bbae676fef1ffe548971e6229ae2adeb9d10 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 66dbb13eeb2fc339f8f548a9076be4c1a94857b0 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 90b662ea25f5e83bb3b8ccec5b93ced810b92fb8 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 9221a594c72a1446137926d4c2aa04e345f798dc (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in a425c82ff06cda5165e0de3de8c2a445ec1f863e (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in b2a017bfcf565721918ec7355a373911d2f2a227 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in fc973ecd1a079b9a87c360478542f3a56dea085b (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.261 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.212 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 5.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.178 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.97 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.15 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.40 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.145 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.1.5 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.2 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

Quick Info

StatusRECEIVED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card