CVE-2026-72155

mtd: spi-nor: swp: Improve locking user experience

N/A
Published: August 15, 2026 at 05:53 AM UTC
Updated: August 23, 2026 at 01:17 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mtd: spi-nor: swp: Improve locking user experience In the case of the first block being locked (or the few first blocks), if the user want to fully unlock the device it has two possibilities: - either it asks to unlock the entire device, and this works; - or it asks to unlock just the block(s) that are currently locked, which fails. It fails because the conditions "can_be_top" and "can_be_bottom" are true. Indeed, in this case, we unlock everything, so the TB bit does not matter. However in the current implementation, use_top would be true (as this is the favourite option) and lock_len, which in practice should be reduced down to 0, is set to "nor->params->size - (ofs + len)" which is a positive number. This is wrong. An easy way is to simply add an extra condition. In the unlock() path, if we can achieve the same result from both sides, it means we unlock everything and lock_len must simply be 0. A comment is added to clarify that logic.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

4.6 ≤ v < 5.10.2664.6 ≤ v < 5.15.2174.6 ≤ v < 6.1.1784.6 ≤ v < 6.12.974.6 ≤ v < 6.18.404.6 ≤ v < 6.6.1454.6 ≤ v < 7.1.54.6 ≤ v < 7.23dd8012a8eeb3702fa17450ec1a16a3f38af138d4.6
Vendor states this is fixed in 12d4d69221159e6d0e72400ec81195d691169b53 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 23c285be8f6fcde9088fe12bb69c701d46696be1 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6110ab5ffd84e8daa654652446a03ce2f77580a7 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 9a0d8dec3d11ca95d67537ea8fa6ee2730a5038a (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in a6fd2145c73b80bb6a5eed7355a4f63597d712d9 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in c0806df5cf806545160f3fdac3c888926ceac557 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in dc341272cf8e15a2c511db3c4df5dab8adf70ad0 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in e1d456b26bf23e30db305a6184e8abd9ab68bbf2 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 4.6 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.266 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.217 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.178 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.97 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.40 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.145 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.1.5 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.2 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

Quick Info

StatusRECEIVED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card