CVE-2026-65775

Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

HIGH
7.8
CVSS Score
Published: August 11, 2026 at 05:06 PM UTC
Updated: October 8, 2026 at 06:13 PM UTC
13 products affected across 1 vendorWindows Server 2016Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012

Using Windows 10 Version 1607 by Microsoft?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Windows 10 Version 1607 - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Use after free in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 10.0.14393.941810.0.14393.0 ≤ v < 10.0.14393.941810.0.14393.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.14393.9418, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.17763.911510.0.17763.0 ≤ v < 10.0.17763.912110.0.17763.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.17763.9115, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 10.0.17763.9121, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.19044.766310.0.19044.0 ≤ v < 10.0.19044.766310.0.19044.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.19044.7663, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.19045.766310.0.19045.0 ≤ v < 10.0.19045.766310.0.19045.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.19045.7663, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.22631.751710.0.22631.0 ≤ v < 10.0.22631.751710.0.22631.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.22631.7517, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.26100.910610.0.26100.0 ≤ v < 10.0.26100.916810.0.26100.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.26100.9106, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 10.0.26100.9168, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.26200.910610.0.26200.0 ≤ v < 10.0.26200.916810.0.26200.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.26200.9106, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 10.0.26200.9168, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.28000.270410.0.28000.0 ≤ v < 10.0.28000.270410.0.28000.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.28000.2704, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
6.2.9200.0 ≤ v < 6.2.9200.262806.3.9600.0 ≤ v < 6.3.9600.233386.2.9200.06.3.9600.0r2
Affected range stops below 6.2.9200.26280, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.3.9600.23338, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.14393.941810.0.14393.0 ≤ v < 10.0.14393.941810.0.14393.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.14393.9418, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (1)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.8HIGHmicrosoft
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-416

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card