CVE-2026-58482

Network-AI: ApprovalInbox HTTP server has no authentication — anyone can approve pending agent actions

MEDIUM
5.9
CVSS Score
Published: July 20, 2026 at 04:38 PM UTC
Updated: October 24, 2026 at 08:10 PM UTC
2 products affected across 2 vendorsNetwork AINetwork-AI

Using Network-AI by Jovancoding?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Network-AI - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.9
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
PoC

Description

Network-AI, a TypeScript/Node.js multi-agent orchestrator, has a shipped, exported, documented feature called `ApprovalInbox` (`lib/approval-inbox.ts`). It is the network surface of the human-in-the-loop Approval Gate, which `ApprovalGate` uses to require explicit human approval for high-risk operations. The HTTP server it exposes has no authentication of any kind and sets `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *` on every route, including the state-changing `POST /approvals/:id/approve` and `/deny`. As a result, in versions 5.0.0 through 5.12.1, any party who can send an HTTP request to the inbox port — a co-located process, a container/SSRF on the same host, a remote client when the operator binds a non-loopback address, or any website the operator visits in a browser (via the wildcard CORS) — can enumerate pending approvals and approve them, defeating the entire human-in-the-loop control and causing the gated high-risk action (e.g. a shell command the agent was holding for review) to execute without consent. This issue is fixed in v5.12.2. `ApprovalInbox` now accepts a `secret` option. When set, the mutating endpoints `POST /:id/approve` and `POST /:id/deny` require an `Authorization: Bearer <secret>` header, validated in constant time with `crypto.timingSafeEqual`. `startServer()` already binds to `127.0.0.1` by default; operators exposing the inbox on a network must set a secret.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

All versions5.0.0 ≤ v < 5.12.2
Affected range stops below 5.12.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 5.12.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

References (3)

x_refsource_CONFIRMExploitMitigationPatchVendor Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://github.com/Jovancoding/Network-AI/security/advisories/GHSA-mxjx-28vx-xjjj
x_refsource_MISCPatchRelease Notes
Source: cverecord
https://github.com/Jovancoding/Network-AI/releases/tag/v5.12.2

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCPoCNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

5.9MEDIUMGitHub_M
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
HIGH
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
REQUIRED
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
LOW
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-352CWE-862

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card