CVE-2026-55952

TLS 1.3 server denial of service via malformed ClientHello pre-shared key extension

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: July 2, 2026 at 04:06 PM UTC
Updated: October 25, 2026 at 09:10 PM UTC
2 products affected across 1 vendorErlang /otpErlang /ssl

Using OTP by Erlang?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect OTP - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.5%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

The Erlang/OTP ssl application does not validate that the PSK identity list and binder list carried in a TLS 1.3 ClientHello pre-shared key extension have equal length before passing them to the session ticket handler. In tls_handshake_1_3:handle_pre_shared_key/3, an OfferedPreSharedKeys record with a mismatched number of identities and binders is forwarded directly to tls_server_session_ticket:use/4, which crashes the session ticket handler process. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a single crafted ClientHello to a TLS 1.3 server with session tickets enabled (stateful or stateless mode) and permanently disrupt session ticket handling on that listener. New TLS 1.3 handshakes complete but subsequently crash when the server attempts to issue a session ticket, effectively making TLS 1.3 unusable on the affected listener until the ssl application is restarted. TLS 1.2 connections are not affected. This issue affects OTP from 22.2 before 29.0.3, 28.5.0.3 and 27.3.4.14 corresponding to ssl from 9.5 before 11.7.3, 11.6.0.3 and 11.2.12.10.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

22.2 ≤ v < 27.3.4.1428.0 ≤ v < 28.5.0.329.0 ≤ v < 29.0.322.2339a279f02ce38a7b23010e56000613e19abb21f9.5
Affected range stops below 27.3.4.14, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 28.5.0.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 29.0.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.3 ≤ v < 11.6.0.311.7 ≤ v < 11.7.39.5 ≤ v < 11.2.12.10
Affected range stops below 11.2.12.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.0.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.7.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-1284

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card