CVE-2026-55951

httpc memory exhaustion via unbounded response header accumulation

HIGH
8.2
CVSS Score
Published: September 1, 2026 at 02:37 PM UTC
Updated: September 8, 2026 at 01:17 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorErlang /otp

Using OTP by Erlang?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect OTP - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.2
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.7%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

The Erlang/OTP httpc HTTP client does not enforce a limit on the total size of response headers received from a server. The max_header_size option defaults to nolimit, and httpc_response:parse_headers/6 accumulates every header into a list before the length check runs (which only fires after the terminating CRLF CRLF is received). A malicious or compromised HTTP server can send an arbitrarily large number of headers, or headers with very large values, causing the client process to allocate unbounded memory until the system runs out of memory or the BEAM VM crashes. A proof-of-concept server sending 100,000 headers of roughly 4000 bytes each caused the client VM to allocate over 13 GB of memory in under 30 seconds. Any application using httpc:request/4,5 to connect to untrusted servers is affected. No authentication is required: any server the client connects to (including via a redirect or man-in-the-middle) can trigger the exhaustion. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 27.3.4.1717.0 ≤ v < 27.3.4.1728.0 ≤ v < 28.5.0.629.0 ≤ v < 29.0.65.10 ≤ v < 9.3.2.79.4 ≤ v < 9.6.2.39.7 ≤ v < 9.7.217.028.029.05.1084adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c19.49.7
Affected range stops below 27.3.4.17, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 28.5.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 29.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.2.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.6.2.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.7.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 17.0 (unknown)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10 (unknown)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

8.2HIGHEEF
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED
CWE
CWE-770

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card