CVE-2026-50131

Fedify has an incomplete SSRF mitigation after GHSA-p9cg-vqcc-grcx: validatePublicUrl allows special-use IPv4 ranges

HIGH
8.6
CVSS Score
Published: June 10, 2026 at 08:27 PM UTC
Updated: July 21, 2026 at 07:26 PM UTC
2 products affected across 1 vendorFedifyVocab Runtime

Using fedify by fedify-dev?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect fedify - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.6
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.4%
SSVC
PoC

Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Fedify previously addressed SSRF/internal network access in GHSA-p9cg-vqcc-grcx by adding public URL validation before runtime document and media fetching. However, the IPv4 validation logic present starting in version 0.11.2 and prior to versions 1.9.12, 1.10.11, 2.0.19, 2.1.15, and 2.2.4 appears incomplete. The `validatePublicUrl()` protection relies on `isValidPublicIPv4Address()` to reject non-public IPv4 destinations. The function blocks common private and local ranges such as `10.0.0.0/8`, `127.0.0.0/8`, `169.254.0.0/16`, `172.16.0.0/12`, and `192.168.0.0/16`, but it still treats several special-use, reserved, multicast, benchmarking, and carrier-grade NAT IPv4 ranges as valid public destinations. Because this validation is used as an SSRF defense before outbound fetches, this appears to be an incomplete mitigation or bypass class for the previous SSRF issue. Versions 1.9.12, 1.10.11, 2.0.19, 2.1.15, and 2.2.4 contain an updated patch.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 1.10.11v < 1.9.12v < 2.0.19v < 2.1.15v < 2.2.4
Affected range stops below 1.10.11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.9.12, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.0.19, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.1.15, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.2.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 2.0.19v < 2.1.15v < 2.2.4
Affected range stops below 2.0.19, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.1.15, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.2.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCPoCAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

8.6HIGHGitHub_M
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
LOW
Availability
LOW
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED
CWE
CWE-918CWE-1286CWE-1389

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card