CVE-2026-50010

Netty's wrapping plain trust manager silently disables hostname verification

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: June 12, 2026 at 02:50 PM UTC
Updated: September 18, 2026 at 02:29 PM UTC
12 products affected across 2 vendorsNettyBuild of KeycloakFuse

Using netty by netty?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect netty - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.5%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final, SimpleTrustManagerFactory.engineGetTrustManagers() and related paths wrap any user-supplied plain X509TrustManager in X509TrustManagerWrapper, which extends X509ExtendedTrustManager but implements the 3-arg checkServerTrusted(chain, authType, SSLEngine) by discarding the SSLEngine and calling the 2-arg delegate. Because the object now IS an X509ExtendedTrustManager, neither SunJSSE's internal AbstractTrustManagerWrapper nor Netty's own OpenSslX509TrustManagerWrapper will re-wrap it to add endpoint-identification. Consequently, even though Netty 4.2 sets endpointIdentificationAlgorithm="HTTPS" by default, a client built with `SslContextBuilder.forClient().trustManager(somePlainX509TrustManager)` performs no hostname verification at all. Versions 4.1.135.Final and 4.2.15.Final patch the issue.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 4.1.135v < 4.1.135.Finalv < 4.2.15.Final4.2.0 ≤ v < 4.2.15
Affected range stops below 4.1.135, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.1.135.Final, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.2.15, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.2.15.Final, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
All versions
All versions
All versions
Vendor states this is fixed in 1787759145 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 1787759723 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (25)

x_refsource_CONFIRMVendor Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-c653-97m9-rcg9
x_refsource_MISCRelease Notes
Source: cverecord
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.135.Final
x_refsource_MISCRelease Notes
Source: cverecord
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.15.Final
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26017
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26018
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26586
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28573
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50010

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.5HIGHGitHub_M
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-347

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card