CVE-2026-48859

SSH server timing side-channel in ssh_auth:check_password/3 allows unauthenticated username enumeration

MEDIUM
5.3
CVSS Score
Published: June 10, 2026 at 02:35 PM UTC
Updated: October 26, 2026 at 11:10 AM UTC
2 products affected across 1 vendorErlang /otpErlang /ssh

Using OTP by Erlang?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect OTP - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.3
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.4%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Observable Timing Discrepancy vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssh (ssh_auth, ssh_options modules) allows unauthenticated remote username enumeration via timing side-channel in password authentication. When the SSH daemon is configured with the user_passwords or password option, ssh_auth:check_password/3 performs a PBKDF2-SHA256 computation with 600,000 iterations (~300ms) for valid usernames, but returns immediately (~0ms) for invalid usernames via the ssh_options:get_password_option/2 path. This timing difference is detectable in a single authentication attempt and allows an unauthenticated attacker to distinguish valid from invalid usernames. The user_passwords and password options are documented as intended for test purposes; the recommended alternative is pwdfun, which is not affected by this vulnerability. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/ssh/src/ssh_auth.erl and lib/ssh/src/ssh_options.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 29.0 before 29.0.2 corresponding to ssh from 6.0 before 6.0.1.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

29.0 ≤ v < 29.0.229.032d1bc9491a3975c68faf9bc7776115d6ae30056.0
Vendor states this is fixed in c342092ef4b369bb409d5b71ac8fd83bab74aedf (fixed)
Affected range stops below 29.0.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.0.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
6.0 ≤ v < 6.0.1
Affected range stops below 6.0.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

References (5)

Vendor AdvisoryRelatedMitigation
Source: cverecord
https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6p-vwhf-wvp4
RelatedMitigationThird Party Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48859.html
RelatedMitigationThird Party Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48859

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
LOW
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-208

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card