CVE-2026-47289

Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

HIGH
8.8
CVSS Score
Published: June 9, 2026 at 05:04 PM UTC
Updated: July 23, 2026 at 07:32 PM UTC
14 products affected across 1 vendorWindows Server 2016Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012

Using Windows 10 Version 1607 by Microsoft?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Windows 10 Version 1607 - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 1.0%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Heap-based buffer overflow in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 10.0.14393.923410.0.14393.0 ≤ v < 10.0.14393.923410.0.14393.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.14393.9234, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.17763.888010.0.17763.0 ≤ v < 10.0.17763.888010.0.17763.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.17763.8880, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.19044.741710.0.19044.0 ≤ v < 10.0.19044.741710.0.19044.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.19044.7417, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.19045.741710.0.19045.0 ≤ v < 10.0.19045.741710.0.19045.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.19045.7417, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.22631.721910.0.22631.0 ≤ v < 10.0.22631.721910.0.22631.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.22631.7219, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.26100.865510.0.26100.0 ≤ v < 10.0.26100.865510.0.26100.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.26100.8655, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.26200.865510.0.26200.0 ≤ v < 10.0.26200.865510.0.26200.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.26200.8655, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.28000.226910.0.28000.0 ≤ v < 10.0.28000.226910.0.28000.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.28000.2269, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 2.0.1193.01.00 ≤ v < 2.0.1193.01.00
Affected range stops below 2.0.1193.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
6.2.9200.0 ≤ v < 6.2.9200.261326.3.9600.0 ≤ v < 6.3.9600.232286.2.9200.06.3.9600.0r2
Affected range stops below 6.2.9200.26132, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.3.9600.23228, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

8.8HIGHmicrosoft
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-122

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card