CVE-2026-47073

Unbounded memory consumption in WebSocket client in hackney

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: May 25, 2026 at 02:00 PM UTC
Updated: July 24, 2026 at 10:23 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorHackney

Using hackney by benoitc?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect hackney - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.9%
SSVC
PoC

Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in benoitc hackney allows Flooding. The WebSocket client in src/hackney_ws.erl imposes no upper bound on memory consumption in three code paths. First, read_handshake_response/3 accumulates received bytes into a growing buffer with no size cap; the per-receive timeout resets on every chunk, so a server that streams bytes without ever sending \r\n\r\n causes the buffer to grow until memory is exhausted. Second, parse_payload/9 and parse_active_payload/8 do not validate the declared frame payload length against any limit; because RFC 6455 allows payload lengths up to 2^63-1 bytes, a server that announces a very large frame and dribbles bytes causes the accumulation buffer to grow until OOM. Third, the frag_buffer field in #ws_data{} accumulates continuation frames indefinitely; a server that sends an endless stream of non-final (nofin) fragmented frames without ever sending a final (fin) frame grows frag_buffer without bound. In all three cases the attacker only needs to control the WebSocket server the hackney client connects to, with no authentication or special client configuration required. This issue affects hackney: from 2.0.0 before 4.0.1.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

2.0.0 ≤ v < 4.0.12.0.0690cecaf236fba49526da404a5bc889a24367a3e
Vendor states this is fixed in ce0109e2970ace6e20ff29bae9d05c3ac22ec6dc (fixed)
Affected range stops below 4.0.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

References (4)

Vendor AdvisoryRelatedExploitPatch
Source: cverecord
https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/security/advisories/GHSA-q8jg-fgj4-fphf
RelatedPatchThird Party Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-47073.html
RelatedPatchThird Party Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-47073

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCPoCAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-400

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card