CVE-2026-46303

isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size

HIGH
8.2
CVSS Score
Published: June 8, 2026 at 03:46 PM UTC
Updated: October 15, 2026 at 02:19 AM UTC
4 products affected across 2 vendorsLinux KernelSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 Pn /dp MFP FirmwareSiplus S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 Pn /dp MFP Firmware

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.2
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: isofs: validate Rock Ridge CE continuation extent against volume size rock_continue() reads rs->cont_extent verbatim from the Rock Ridge CE record and passes it to sb_bread() without checking that the block number is within the mounted ISO 9660 volume. commit e595447e177b ("[PATCH] rock.c: handle corrupted directories") added cont_offset and cont_size rejection for the CE continuation but did not validate the extent block number itself. commit f54e18f1b831 ("isofs: Fix infinite looping over CE entries") later capped the CE chain length at RR_MAX_CE_ENTRIES = 32 but again left the block number unchecked. With a crafted ISO mounted via udisks2 (desktop optical auto-mount) or via CAP_SYS_ADMIN mount, rs->cont_extent can therefore point at an out-of-range block or at blocks belonging to an adjacent filesystem on the same block device. sb_bread() on an out-of-range block returns NULL cleanly via the block layer EIO path, so there is no memory-safety violation. For in-range reads of adjacent- filesystem data, the CE buffer is parsed as Rock Ridge records and only the text of SL sub-records reaches userspace through readlink(), which makes the info-leak channel narrow and difficult to exploit; still, rejecting the malformed CE outright matches the rejection shape already present in the same function for cont_offset and cont_size. Add an ISOFS_SB(sb)->s_nzones bounds check to rock_continue() next to the existing offset/size rejection, printing the same corrupted-directory-entry notice.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

2.6.32.66 ≤ v < 2.6.333.10.64 ≤ v < 3.113.12.36 ≤ v < 3.133.14.28 ≤ v < 3.153.17.8 ≤ v < 3.183.18.2 ≤ v < 5.10.2583.2.67 ≤ v < 3.33.4.107 ≤ v < 3.55.11 ≤ v < 5.15.2095.16 ≤ v < 6.1.1756.13 ≤ v < 6.18.306.19 ≤ v < 7.0.76.2 ≤ v < 6.6.1406.7 ≤ v < 6.12.881fe5620fcd6c2f0a4a927ee10c8e53196da392f32.6.32.66212c4d33ca83e2144064fe9c2911607fbed5386f3.10.643.12.363.14.283.17.83.18.23.2.673.4.107486aa789eadcf44ed87f972b209299c5164546937.17.1 rc18190393a88f2b0321263a54f2a9eb5a2aa43be7e8313e26e6d4aa9ce1cbba1a8e359e9cab9ad5696e44adce250199ec9b2b928be66365779ff1b59b6d20edb6e7cedb4eedb9e0193d20dd488ebae84f54e18f1b831c92f6512d2eedb224cd63d607d3dfbce0d7dc8965c9fb8d411862040239d4a768c71
Vendor states this is fixed in 22b36fa081f38ab397c7697f9d539211b51a0cfc (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8356fb821016797f5677cbeee5ddc0d32a95b4be (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in a36d990f591320e9dd379ab30063ebfe91d47e1f (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in bf1bc673c587f5ef7e9c09b94aea7c5a7847d4d9 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in c9b37c8b73f6368e4750e5ccb0632c380b43c6e5 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in d582e12378bc1637f337622feef762f53c43fd57 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in e69da8eeab74b4f4505024c38a17bce060fe7df8 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in ef048470c90bc8c1b8318bb2ce329da9ef64b9fe (fixed)
Affected range stops below 2.6.33, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.13, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.15, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.18, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 3.19 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 3.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.258 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.209 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.175 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.88 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.30 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.140 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.0.7 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.1 (unaffected)

CVSS

8.2HIGHLinux
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-401

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card