CVE-2026-45920

ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown

HIGH
7.8
CVSS Score
Published: May 27, 2026 at 12:17 PM UTC
Updated: June 27, 2026 at 11:41 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.1%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix dirtyclusters double decrement on fs shutdown fstests test generic/388 occasionally reproduces a warning in ext4_put_super() associated with the dirty clusters count: WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 76064 at fs/ext4/super.c:1324 ext4_put_super+0x48c/0x590 [ext4] Tracing the failure shows that the warning fires due to an s_dirtyclusters_counter value of -1. IOW, this appears to be a spurious decrement as opposed to some sort of leak. Further tracing of the dirty cluster count deltas and an LLM scan of the resulting output identified the cause as a double decrement in the error path between ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() and the caller ext4_mb_new_blocks(). First, note that generic/388 is a shutdown vs. fsstress test and so produces a random set of operations and shutdown injections. In the problematic case, the shutdown triggers an error return from the ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() call(s) made from ext4_mb_mark_context(). The changed value is non-zero at this point, so ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used() does not exit after the error bubbles up from ext4_mb_mark_context(). Instead, the former decrements both cluster counters and returns the error up to ext4_mb_new_blocks(). The latter falls into the !ar->len out path which decrements the dirty clusters counter a second time, creating the inconsistency. To avoid this problem and simplify ownership of the cluster reservation in this codepath, lift the counter reduction to a single place in the caller. This makes it more clear that ext4_mb_new_blocks() is responsible for acquiring cluster reservation (via ext4_claim_free_clusters()) in the !delalloc case as well as releasing it, regardless of whether it ends up consumed or returned due to failure.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

2.6.29 ≤ v < 5.10.2532.6.29 ≤ v < 5.15.2032.6.29 ≤ v < 6.1.1672.6.29 ≤ v < 6.12.752.6.29 ≤ v < 6.18.142.6.29 ≤ v < 6.19.42.6.29 ≤ v < 6.6.1302.6.29 ≤ v < 7.05.11 ≤ v < 5.15.2035.16 ≤ v < 6.1.1676.13 ≤ v < 6.18.146.19 ≤ v < 6.19.46.2 ≤ v < 6.6.1306.7 ≤ v < 6.12.752.6.2987d9fb3f29f59e8d42c8b58376d80e5adde4c
Vendor states this is fixed in 3924aea2c33df3864929c1acd178bfc29d8f005f (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 523d5a4df3c649fa305c89efb552ec62a1ce9d3d (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 55576fa14771d33994c29a9ae960e07bb3f56c20 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 61e372122b6d95aec940fdaea0a16f988f359897 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 81982a11406c5da6c6e2b188028e7056e16b7128 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 94a8cea54cd935c54fa2fba70354757c0fc245e3 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in ca408af08544d96769c93a3d81a7f63f61129e95 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in dbc4e10619ed87a50e637b96f2e574df36a7a769 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 2.6.29 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.253 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.203 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.167 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.75 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18.14 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.19.4 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.130 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.0 (unaffected)

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusUNDERGOING ANALYSIS
CWE
CWE-415

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card