CVE-2026-42790

nameConstraints DNS bypass via subject CommonName fallback in public_key hostname verification

HIGH
8.1
CVSS Score
Published: May 27, 2026 at 03:09 PM UTC
Updated: October 26, 2026 at 11:10 AM UTC
3 products affected across 2 vendorsErlang /otpHardened ImagesOpenStack Platform

Using OTP by Erlang?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect OTP - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.1
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_cert and public_key modules) allows a DNS nameConstraints bypass via subject CommonName fallback in TLS hostname verification. Two flaws combine to allow a subordinate CA whose DNS nameConstraints are restricted (e.g. permitted;DNS:allowed.example.com) to issue a leaf certificate that an OTP TLS client accepts as a valid identity for an out-of-scope hostname (e.g. victim.example.com): First, pubkey_cert:validate_names/6 in lib/public_key/src/pubkey_cert.erl only checks SAN DNS entries against nameConstraints. Per RFC 5280, a permitted DNS subtree only restricts certificates that contain a DNS-typed name. A leaf with no subjectAltName therefore trivially satisfies any permitted;DNS:... constraint regardless of its subject commonName. Second, public_key:pkix_verify_hostname/3 in lib/public_key/src/public_key.erl falls back to the subject commonName when no subjectAltName is present, extracting id-at-commonName attributes as presented IDs and matching them against the reference hostname. The strict pkix_verify_hostname_match_fun(https) matcher does not suppress this fallback. The result is that path validation accepts a CN-only leaf under a DNS-constrained intermediate (no SAN means the nameConstraints are not triggered), and hostname verification then accepts it via the CN fallback. The bypass is reachable from stock ssl:connect with verify_peer, a trusted CA, SNI, and the canonical strict https hostname matcher. This issue affects OTP from OTP 19.3 before OTP 26.2.5.21, 27.3.4.12, 28.5.0.1, and 29.0.1 corresponding to public_key from 1.4 before 1.15.1.7, 1.17.1.3, 1.20.3.1, and 1.21.1.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

19.3 ≤ v < 26.2.5.2127.0 ≤ v < 27.3.4.1228.0 ≤ v < 28.5.0.129.0 ≤ v < 29.0.11.419.3b0c245e8132bb13171e277b1af59c0cec00c9459
Affected range stops below 26.2.5.21, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 27.3.4.12, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 28.5.0.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 29.0.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
All versions
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:23.3.4.18-2.el8ost (unaffected)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
REQUIRED
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-295CWE-297

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card