CVE-2026-32144

OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification

HIGH
7.4
CVSS Score
Published: April 7, 2026 at 12:28 PM UTC
Updated: October 26, 2026 at 10:10 PM UTC
4 products affected across 2 vendorsErlang /otpErlang /sslErlang /public Key

Using OTP by Erlang?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect OTP - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.4
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification. The OCSP response validation in public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 does not verify that a CA-designated responder certificate was cryptographically signed by the issuing CA. Instead, it only checks that the responder certificate's issuer name matches the CA's subject name and that the certificate has the OCSPSigning extended key usage. An attacker who can intercept or control OCSP responses can create a self-signed certificate with a matching issuer name and the OCSPSigning EKU, and use it to forge OCSP responses that mark revoked certificates as valid. This affects SSL/TLS clients using OCSP stapling, which may accept connections to servers with revoked certificates, potentially transmitting sensitive data to compromised servers. Applications using the public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 API directly are also affected, with impact depending on usage context. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl and program routines pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 until OTP 28.4.2 and 27.3.4.10 corresponding to public_key from 1.16 until 1.20.3 and 1.17.1.2, and ssl from 11.2 until 11.5.4 and 11.2.12.7.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

27.0 ≤ v < 27.3.4.1028.0 ≤ v < 28.4.21.1611.227.0601a012837ea0a5c8095bf24223132824177124d
Affected range stops below 27.3.4.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 28.4.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
1.16 ≤ v < 1.17.1.21.18 ≤ v < 1.20.3
Affected range stops below 1.17.1.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.20.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.2 ≤ v < 11.2.12.711.3 < v < 11.5.4
Affected range stops below 11.2.12.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.5.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

References (9)

Vendor AdvisoryRelatedMitigationThird Party Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gxrm-pf64-99xm
RelatedMitigationVendor Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32144.html
RelatedThird Party Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32144
x_version-schemeVendor Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32144
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2455896

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.4HIGHredhat-SADP
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
HIGH
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-295CWE-347

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card