CVE-2026-29205

HIGH
8.6
CVSS Score
Published: May 13, 2026 at 10:06 PM UTC
Updated: October 26, 2026 at 02:10 PM UTC
5 products affected across 2 vendorsCpanelWhmWp Squared

Using cPanel by WebPros?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect cPanel - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.6
Exploit prediction
EPSS 8%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Incorrect privileges management and insufficient path filtering allow to read arbitrary file on the server via the cpdavd attachment download endpoints.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

120.0.0 ≤ v < 124.0.38126.0.0 ≤ v < 126.0.59130.0.0 ≤ v < 130.0.23130.0.23 ≤ v < 130.0.23132.0.0 ≤ v < 132.0.32134.0.0 ≤ v < 134.0.26136.0.0 ≤ v < 136.0.10
Affected range stops below 124.0.38, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 126.0.59, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 130.0.23, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 132.0.32, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 134.0.26, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 136.0.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
120.0.0 ≤ v < 124.0.38126.0.0 ≤ v < 126.0.59130.0.0 ≤ v < 130.0.23132.0.0 ≤ v < 132.0.32134.0.0 ≤ v < 134.0.26136.0.0 ≤ v < 136.0.10
Affected range stops below 124.0.38, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 126.0.59, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 130.0.23, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 132.0.32, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 134.0.26, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 136.0.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
120.1.0 ≤ v < 136.1.12
Affected range stops below 136.1.12, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.120.0.0 ≤ v < 11.124.0.3811.126.0.0 ≤ v < 11.126.0.5911.130.0.0 ≤ v < 11.130.0.2311.132.0.0 ≤ v < 11.132.0.3211.134.0.0 ≤ v < 11.134.0.2611.136.0.0 ≤ v < 11.136.0.1011.120.0.011.126.0.011.130.0.011.132.0.011.134.0.011.136.0.0
Affected range stops below 11.124.0.38, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.126.0.59, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.130.0.23, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.132.0.32, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.134.0.26, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.136.0.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.120.1.0 ≤ v < 11.136.1.1211.120.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.136.1.12, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

8.6HIGHhackerone
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-250

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card