CVE-2026-27654

NGINX ngx_http_dav_module vulnerability

HIGH
8.2
CVSS Score
Published: March 24, 2026 at 02:13 PM UTC
Updated: July 15, 2026 at 02:19 AM UTC
2 products affected across 1 vendorNGINX PlusNGINX Open Source

Using NGINX Open Source by F5?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect NGINX Open Source - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.2
Exploit prediction
EPSS 26%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus have a vulnerability in the ngx_http_dav_module module that might allow an attacker to trigger a buffer overflow to the NGINX worker process; this vulnerability may result in termination of the NGINX worker process or modification of source or destination file names outside the document root. This issue affects NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus when the configuration file uses DAV module MOVE or COPY methods, prefix location (nonregular expression location configuration), and alias directives. The integrity impact is constrained because the NGINX worker process user has low privileges and does not have access to the entire system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

0.5.13 ≤ v ≤ 0.9.70.5.13 ≤ v < 1.28.31.0.0 ≤ v < 1.28.31.29.0 ≤ v < 1.29.70.5.131.29.0
Affected range stops below 1.28.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 1.29.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v ≥ R33v ≥ R34R32 ≤ v < R32 P5R35 ≤ v < R35 P2R36 ≤ v < R36 P3R32R33R34R35R36r32 p1r32 p2r32 p3r32 p4r33r33 p1r33 p2r33 p3r34r34 p1r34 p2r35r35 p1r36r36 p1r36 p2
Affected range stops below R32 P5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below R35 P2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below R36 P3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (19)

Vendor Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000160382
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10065
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13634
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13680
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13839
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14836
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15942
Source: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15943

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

8.2HIGHf5
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
LOW
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-122CWE-120

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card