CVE-2026-2415

Unsafe variable evaluation in email templates

MEDIUM
5.9
CVSS Score
Published: February 16, 2026 at 10:15 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 10:30 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorPretix

Using pretix by pretix?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect pretix - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.9
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Emails sent by pretix can utilize placeholders that will be filled with customer data. For example, when {name} is used in an email template, it will be replaced with the buyer's name for the final email. This mechanism contained two security-relevant bugs: * It was possible to exfiltrate information about the pretix system through specially crafted placeholder names such as {{event.__init__.__code__.co_filename}}. This way, an attacker with the ability to control email templates (usually every user of the pretix backend) could retrieve sensitive information from the system configuration, including even database passwords or API keys. pretix does include mechanisms to prevent the usage of such malicious placeholders, however due to a mistake in the code, they were not fully effective for the email subject. * Placeholders in subjects and plain text bodies of emails were wrongfully evaluated twice. Therefore, if the first evaluation of a placeholder again contains a placeholder, this second placeholder was rendered. This allows the rendering of placeholders controlled by the ticket buyer, and therefore the exploitation of the first issue as a ticket buyer. Luckily, the only buyer-controlled placeholder available in pretix by default (that is not validated in a way that prevents the issue) is {invoice_company}, which is very unusual (but not impossible) to be contained in an email subject template. In addition to broadening the attack surface of the first issue, this could theoretically also leak information about an order to one of the attendees within that order. However, we also consider this scenario very unlikely under typical conditions. Out of caution, we recommend that you rotate all passwords and API keys contained in your pretix.cfg https://docs.pretix.eu/self-hosting/config/  file.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

2025.10.0 ≤ v < 2026.1.02025.9.0 ≤ v < 2025.10.02026.1.0 ≤ v < 2026.1.14.16.0 ≤ v < 2025.9.04.16.0 ≤ v < 2026.1.12025.10.02025.9.02026.1.04.16.0
Affected range stops below 2025.10.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2025.9.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2026.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2026.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (1)

Vendor AdvisoryPatchThird Party Advisory
Source: cverecord
https://pretix.eu/about/en/blog/20260216-release-2026-1-1/

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
HIGH
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-627

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card