CVE-2026-18149

undici vulnerable to Denial of Service via orphaned RetryHandler response body

MEDIUM
5.9
CVSS Score
Published: September 4, 2026 at 05:21 PM UTC
Updated: September 16, 2026 at 08:54 PM UTC
2 products affected across 2 vendorsUndiciUndici

Using undici by undici?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect undici - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.9
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.5%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

undici's retry handler can leave an already-exposed response body pending forever. When a server returns a successful response that declares a Content-Length, sends only part of the body, and closes the connection, the retry handler retries the request. If the retry returns a non-retryable status such as 400, the handler forwards that new response downstream and replaces its internal response stream, but the original response body that the application still holds is never ended or destroyed. As a result calls that read that body never settle, and the configured body timeout does not fire because its timer is tied to the connection parser rather than the orphaned body. An attacker-controlled server can trigger this with two short responses without keeping a connection open, and repeated requests accumulate pending promises and streams that can exhaust application concurrency or memory. This affects undici versions from 7.11.0 up to 7.29.1 and from 8.0.0 up to 8.10.2. Users should upgrade to undici 7.29.1 or 8.10.2.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

7.11.0 ≤ v < 7.29.18.0.0 ≤ v < 8.10.2
Affected range stops below 7.29.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.10.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
7.11.0 ≤ v < 7.29.18.0.0 ≤ v < 8.10.27.11.08.0.0
Vendor states this is fixed in 7.29.1 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8.10.2 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (2)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

5.9MEDIUMopenjs
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-772

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card