CVE-2026-115635

AshPostgres returns another tenant's record for a skipped upsert when return_skipped_upsert? is set

MEDIUM
6
CVSS Score
Published: October 25, 2026 at 07:48 PM UTC
Updated: October 26, 2026 at 03:16 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorAshPostgres

Using ash_postgres by ash-project?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect ash_postgres - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM6
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_postgres allows a user to read another tenant's record through a skipped upsert. When Ash.bulk_create/4 or a single create runs as an upsert with return_skipped_upsert?: true and the upsert is skipped (for example because its upsert_condition does not hold), AshPostgres.DataLayer reads the existing row back by the upsert identity in do_bulk_create/3 and upsert/4. That lookup did not apply the resource's attribute multitenancy, so on a resource using strategy :attribute it could match and return the row of another tenant with the same identity values, exposing its fields to the caller. This issue affects ash_postgres: from 2.6.22 before 2.15.2.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

2.6.22af0903f1380468bbe1b61fe65acb33772b5e24a5

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

6MEDIUMEEF
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED
CWE
CWE-863

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card