CVE-2026-0417
Insufficient input validation in certain NETGEAR routers
MEDIUM
4.5
CVSS Score
Published: June 9, 2026 at 03:50 PM UTC
Updated: July 23, 2026 at 07:32 PM UTC
54 products affected across 1 vendorR7000P FirmwareR7000 FirmwareR6900P Firmware
Using MR60 by NETGEAR?
Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect MR60 - before attackers find them.
Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit
Description
Insufficient input validation vulnerability in NETGEAR devices allows authenticated administrators connected to the local network to tamper with the router's integrity.
Affected
Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.
v < 1.1.7.132v < V1.1.7.132
Affected range stops below 1.1.7.132, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.1.7.132, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
netgear-mr60 (same device)
v < 1.0.3.28v < V1.0.3.28
Affected range stops below 1.0.3.28, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.0.3.28, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
netgear-mr70 (same device)
v < 1.1.7.14v < V1.1.7.14
Affected range stops below 1.1.7.14, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.1.7.14, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
netgear-mr80 (same device)
v < 1.1.7.132v < V1.1.7.132
Affected range stops below 1.1.7.132, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.1.7.132, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
netgear-ms60 (same device)
v < 1.0.3.28v < V1.0.3.28
Affected range stops below 1.0.3.28, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.0.3.28, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
netgear-ms70 (same device)
v < 1.1.7.14v < V1.1.7.14
Affected range stops below 1.1.7.14, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.1.7.14, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
netgear-ms80 (same device)
v < 1.0.4.128v < V1.0.4.128
Affected range stops below 1.0.4.128, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.0.4.128, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 1.0.4.128v < V1.0.4.128
Affected range stops below 1.0.4.128, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.0.4.128, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
netgear-r6700v3 (same device)
v < 1.3.3.152v < V1.3.3.152
Affected range stops below 1.3.3.152, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.3.3.152, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 1.0.11.216v < V1.0.11.216
Affected range stops below 1.0.11.216, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below V1.0.11.216, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
netgear-r7000 (same device)
Remediation
No guide yetNo remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:
References (28)
SSVC — Action Prioritization
SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact
SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.
CVSS
- Attack Vector
- ADJACENT_NETWORK
- Complexity
- LOW
- Privileges
- HIGH
- User Interaction
- NONE
- Scope
- UNCHANGED
- Confidentiality
- NONE
- Integrity
- HIGH
- Availability
- NONE
Vector?
Quick Info
StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-20NVD-CWE-noinfo
Get alerted
Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack
Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.
Free plan, no card