CVE-2025-52984

Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: When a static route points to a reject next-hop and a gNMI query for this route is processed, RPD crashes

MEDIUM
5.9
CVSS Score
Published: July 11, 2025 at 03:09 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 09:37 AM UTC
3 products affected across 2 vendorsJunosJunos OS EvolvedJunos OS Evolved

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.9
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.5%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause impact to the availability of the device. When static route points to a reject next hop and a gNMI query is processed for that static route, rpd crashes and restarts. This issue affects: Junos OS:  * all versions before 21.2R3-S9, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S10,  * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S6, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S6, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S3, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2; Junos OS Evolved: * all versions before 22.4R3-S7-EVO, * 23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S3-EVO, * 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S4-EVO, * 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-EVO.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 21.2R3-S9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R3-S10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.4R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.2R2-S3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.4R2-S4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 24.2R1-S2, 24.2R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 22.4R3-S7-EVO23.2-EVO ≤ v < 23.2R2-S3-EVO23.4-EVO ≤ v < 23.4R2-S4-EVO24.2-EVO ≤ v < 24.2R2-EVO23.2-EVO23.4-EVO24.2-EVO
Affected range stops below 22.4R3-S7-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.2R2-S3-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.4R2-S4-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 24.2R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

5.9MEDIUMjuniper
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
HIGH
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-476

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card