CVE-2025-40306

orangefs: fix xattr related buffer overflow...

HIGH
7.8
CVSS Score
Published: December 8, 2025 at 12:46 AM UTC
Updated: October 14, 2026 at 10:10 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: orangefs: fix xattr related buffer overflow... Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> forwarded me a message from Disclosure <[email protected]> with the following warning: > The helper `xattr_key()` uses the pointer variable in the loop condition > rather than dereferencing it. As `key` is incremented, it remains non-NULL > (until it runs into unmapped memory), so the loop does not terminate on > valid C strings and will walk memory indefinitely, consuming CPU or hanging > the thread. I easily reproduced this with setfattr and getfattr, causing a kernel oops, hung user processes and corrupted orangefs files. Disclosure sent along a diff (not a patch) with a suggested fix, which I based this patch on. After xattr_key started working right, xfstest generic/069 exposed an xattr related memory leak that lead to OOM. xattr_key returns a hashed key. When adding xattrs to the orangefs xattr cache, orangefs used hash_add, a kernel hashing macro. hash_add also hashes the key using hash_log which resulted in additions to the xattr cache going to the wrong hash bucket. generic/069 tortures a single file and orangefs does a getattr for the xattr "security.capability" every time. Orangefs negative caches on xattrs which includes a kmalloc. Since adds to the xattr cache were going to the wrong bucket, every getattr for "security.capability" resulted in another kmalloc, none of which were ever freed. I changed the two uses of hash_add to hlist_add_head instead and the memory leak ceased and generic/069 quit throwing furniture.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

4.6f7ab093f74bf638ed98fd1115f3efa17e308bb7f
Vendor states this is fixed in 025e880759c279ec64d0f754fe65bf45961da864 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 15afebb9597449c444801d1ff0b8d8b311f950ab (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 9127d1e90c90e5960c8bc72a4ce2c209691a7021 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in bc812574de633cf9a9ad6974490e45f6a4bb5126 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in c2ca015ac109fd743fdde27933d59dc5ad46658e (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in c6564ff6b53c9a8dc786b6f1c51ae7688273f931 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in e09a096104fc65859422817fb2211f35855983fe (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in ef892d2bf4f3fa2c8de1677dd307e678bdd3d865 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 4.6 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.247 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.197 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.4.302 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.159 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.58 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.17.8 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.117 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

CVSS

7.8HIGHLinux
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card