CVE-2025-40231

vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport()

N/A
Published: December 4, 2025 at 03:31 PM UTC
Updated: October 19, 2026 at 09:10 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport() Syzbot reported a potential lock inversion deadlock between vsock_register_mutex and sk_lock-AF_VSOCK when vsock_linger() is called. The issue was introduced by commit 687aa0c5581b ("vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU") which added vsock_register_mutex locking in vsock_assign_transport() around the transport->release() call, that can call vsock_linger(). vsock_assign_transport() can be called with sk_lock held. vsock_linger() calls sk_wait_event() that temporarily releases and re-acquires sk_lock. During this window, if another thread hold vsock_register_mutex while trying to acquire sk_lock, a circular dependency is created. Fix this by releasing vsock_register_mutex before calling transport->release() and vsock_deassign_transport(). This is safe because we don't need to hold vsock_register_mutex while releasing the old transport, and we ensure the new transport won't disappear by obtaining a module reference first via try_module_get().

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

5.10.240 ≤ v < 5.10.2465.15.189 ≤ v < 5.15.1966.1.146 ≤ v < 6.1.1586.12.39 ≤ v < 6.12.566.15.7 ≤ v < 6.166.6.99 ≤ v < 6.6.11536a439049b34cca0b3661276049b84a1f76cc21a5.10.2405.15.1896.1.1466.12.396.15.76.166.6.99687aa0c5581b8d4aa87fd92973e4ee576b550cdf7b73bddf54777fb62d4d8c7729d0affe6df044778667e8d0eb46bc54fdae30ba2f4786407d3d88eb9ce53e744f18e73059d3124070e960f3aa9902bf9d24bb6780282b0255b9929abe5e8f98007e2c6eae2c712ba39c7007de63cb0c75b51ce1caaf1da5
Vendor states this is fixed in 09bba278ccde25a14b6e5088a9e65a8717d0cccf (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 251caee792a21eb0b781aab91362b422c945e162 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 42ed0784d11adebf748711e503af0eb9f1e6d81d (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in a2a4346eea8b4cb75037dbcb20b98cb454324f80 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in b44182c116778feaa05da52a426aeb9da1878dcf (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in ce4f856c64f0bc30e29302a0ce41f4295ca391c5 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in f7c877e7535260cc7a21484c994e8ce7e8cb6780 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.246 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.196 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.158 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.56 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.16 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.17.6 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.18 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.115 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card