CVE-2025-33221
MEDIUM
6
CVSS Score
Published: May 26, 2026 at 05:26 PM UTC
Updated: July 24, 2026 at 11:23 AM UTC
7 products affected across 1 vendorNVIDIA GPU Display DriverVirtual GPUTesla
Using GeForce by NVIDIA?
Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect GeForce - before attackers find them.
Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM6
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit
Description
NVIDIA Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel driver, where a user could cause an incorrect permission assignment for a critical resource. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to data tampering and denial of service.
Affected
Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.
535 ≤ v < 535.309.01535 ≤ v < 539.72580 ≤ v < 580.159.03580 ≤ v < 582.53595 ≤ v < 595.36595 ≤ v < 595.71.05
Affected range stops below 535.309.01, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 539.72, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 580.159.03, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 582.53, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 595.36, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 595.71.05, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 535.309.01v < 580.159.03v < 582.53v < 595.71.05v < 596.36
Affected range stops below 535.309.01, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 580.159.03, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 582.53, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 595.71.05, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 596.36, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 535.309.01v < 539.72v < 580.159.03v < 582.53v < 595.71.05v < 596.36
Affected range stops below 535.309.01, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 539.72, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 580.159.03, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 582.53, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 595.71.05, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 596.36, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 535.309.01v < 539.72v < 580.159.03v < 582.53v < 595.71.05v < 596.36
Affected range stops below 535.309.01, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 539.72, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 580.159.03, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 582.53, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 595.71.05, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 596.36, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 535.309.01v < 539.72v < 580.159.03v < 582.53v < 595.71.05v < 596.36
Affected range stops below 535.309.01, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 539.72, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 580.159.03, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 582.53, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 595.71.05, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 596.36, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 535.309.01v < 539.72v < 580.159.03v < 582.53v < 595.71.05v < 596.36
Affected range stops below 535.309.01, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 539.72, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 580.159.03, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 582.53, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 595.71.05, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 596.36, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
535.288.01(All versions prior to and including vGPU 16.13)539.64(All versions prior to and including vGPU 16.13)580.126.09(All versions prior to and including vGPU 19.4)582.16(All versions prior to and including vGPU 19.4)595.58.03(All versions prior to and including vGPU 20.0)595.58.03(All versions up to and including the March 2026 release)595.97(All versions prior to and including vGPU 20.0)
Remediation
No guide yetNo remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:
Patch and advisory references
References (3)
SSVC — Action Prioritization
SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact
SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.
CVSS
- Attack Vector
- LOCAL
- Complexity
- LOW
- Privileges
- HIGH
- User Interaction
- NONE
- Scope
- UNCHANGED
- Confidentiality
- NONE
- Integrity
- HIGH
- Availability
- HIGH
Vector?
Quick Info
StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-20
Get alerted
Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack
Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.
Free plan, no card