CVE-2025-33064

Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

HIGH
8.8
CVSS Score
Published: June 10, 2025 at 05:02 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 09:13 AM UTC
16 products affected across 1 vendorWindows Server 2016Windows Server 2019Windows Server 2012

Using Windows 10 Version 1809 by Microsoft?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Windows 10 Version 1809 - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 1%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 10.0.10240.2103410.0.10240.0 ≤ v < 10.0.10240.2103410.0.10240.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.10240.21034, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.14393.814810.0.14393.0 ≤ v < 10.0.14393.814810.0.14393.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.14393.8148, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.17763.743410.0.17763.0 ≤ v < 10.0.17763.743410.0.17763.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.17763.7434, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.19044.596510.0.19044.0 ≤ v < 10.0.19044.596510.0.19044.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.19044.5965, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.19045.596510.0.19045.0 ≤ v < 10.0.19045.596510.0.19045.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.19045.5965, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.22621.547210.0.22621.0 ≤ v < 10.0.22621.547210.0.22621.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.22621.5472, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.22631.547210.0.22631.0 ≤ v < 10.0.22631.547210.0.22631.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.22631.5472, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 10.0.26100.427010.0.26100.0 ≤ v < 10.0.26100.434910.0.26100.0
Affected range stops below 10.0.26100.4270, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 10.0.26100.4349, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
6.0.6003.0 ≤ v < 6.0.6003.233516.1.7601.0 ≤ v < 6.1.7601.277696.0.6003.06.1.7601.0r2 sp1sp2
Affected range stops below 6.0.6003.23351, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.1.7601.27769, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
6.2.9200.0 ≤ v < 6.2.9200.255226.3.9600.0 ≤ v < 6.3.9600.226206.2.9200.06.3.9600.0r2
Affected range stops below 6.2.9200.25522, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.3.9600.22620, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

8.8HIGHmicrosoft
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-122

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card