CVE-2025-31124

Zitadel allows User Enumeration by loginname attribute normalization

MEDIUM
5.3
CVSS Score
Published: March 31, 2025 at 07:38 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 09:09 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorZitadel

Using zitadel by zitadel?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect zitadel - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.3
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.5%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Zitadel is open-source identity infrastructure software. ZITADEL administrators can enable a setting called "Ignoring unknown usernames" which helps mitigate attacks that try to guess/enumerate usernames. If enabled, ZITADEL will show the password prompt even if the user doesn't exist and report "Username or Password invalid". While the setting was correctly respected during the login flow, the user's username was normalized leading to a disclosure of the user's existence. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.71.6, 2.70.8, 2.69.9, 2.68.9, 2.67.13, 2.66.16, 2.65.7, 2.64.6, and 2.63.9.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 2.63.9v < 2.64.6v < 2.65.7v < 2.66.16v < 2.67.13v < 2.68.9v < 2.69.9v < 2.70.8v < 2.71.62.64.0 ≤ v < 2.64.62.65.0 ≤ v < 2.65.72.66.0 ≤ v < 2.66.162.67.0 ≤ v < 2.67.132.68.0 ≤ v < 2.68.92.69.0 ≤ v < 2.69.92.70.0 ≤ v < 2.70.82.71.0 ≤ v < 2.71.6
Affected range stops below 2.63.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.64.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.65.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.66.16, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.67.13, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.68.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.69.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.70.8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.71.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

5.3MEDIUMGitHub_M
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
LOW
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-200CWE-203CWE-204

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card