CVE-2025-30655

Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A specific CLI command will cause an RPD crash when rib-sharding and update-threading is enabled

MEDIUM
5.5
CVSS Score
Published: April 9, 2025 at 08:01 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 09:09 AM UTC
3 products affected across 2 vendorsJunosJunos OS EvolvedJunos OS Evolved

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.1%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low-privileged attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). When a specific "show bgp neighbor" CLI command is run, the rpd cpu utilization rises and eventually causes a crash and restart. Repeated use of this command will cause a sustained DoS condition. The device is only affected if BGP RIB sharding and update-threading is enabled. This issue affects Junos OS: * All versions before 21.2R3-S9,  * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S8, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S6,  * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S2,  * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3,  * from 23.4 before 23.4R2. and Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S9-EVO,  * from 21.4-EVO before 21.4R3-S8-EVO,  * from 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S6-EVO,  * from 22.4-EVO before 22.4R3-S2-EVO,  * from 23.2-EVO before 23.2R2-S3-EVO,  * from 23.4-EVO before 23.4R2-EVO.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 21.2R3-S9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R3-S8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.4R3-S2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.2R2-S3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.4R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 21.2R3-S9-EVO21.4-EVO ≤ v < 21.4R3-S8-EVO22.2-EVO ≤ v < 22.2R3-S6-EVO22.4-EVO ≤ v < 22.4R3-S2-EVO23.2-EVO ≤ v < 23.2R2-S3-EVO23.4-EVO ≤ v < 23.4R2-EVO21.4-EVO22.2-EVO22.4-EVO23.2-EVO23.4-EVO
Affected range stops below 21.2R3-S9-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R3-S8-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R3-S6-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.4R3-S2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.2R2-S3-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.4R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

5.5MEDIUMjuniper
Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-754

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card