CVE-2025-30652

Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: Executing a specific CLI command when asregex-optimized is configured causes an rpd crash

MEDIUM
5.5
CVSS Score
Published: April 9, 2025 at 07:57 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 09:09 AM UTC
3 products affected across 2 vendorsJunosJunos OS EvolvedJunos OS Evolved

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

An Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, low-privileged attacker executing a CLI command to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When asregex-optimized is configured and a specific "show route as-path" CLI command is executed, the rpd crashes and restarts. Repeated execution of this command will cause a sustained DoS condition. This issue affects Junos OS: * All versions before 21.2R3-S9, * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S10, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S6, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S6, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S4, * from 24.2 before 24.2R2. and Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S9-EVO, * from 21.4-EVO before 21.4R3-S10-EVO, * from 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S6-EVO, * from 22.4-EVO before 22.4R3-S6-EVO, * from 23.2-EVO before 23.2R2-S3-EVO, * from 23.4-EVO before 23.4R2-S4-EVO, * from 24.2-EVO before 24.2R2-EVO.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 21.2R3-S9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R3-S10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.4R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.2R2-S3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.4R2-S4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 24.2R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 21.2R3-S9-EVO21.4-EVO ≤ v < 21.4R3-S10-EVO22.2-EVO ≤ v < 22.2R3-S6-EVO22.4-EVO ≤ v < 22.4R3-S6-EVO23.2-EVO ≤ v < 23.2R2-S3-EVO23.4-EVO ≤ v < 23.4R2-S4-EVO24.2-EVO ≤ v < 24.2R2-EVO21.4-EVO22.2-EVO22.4-EVO23.2-EVO23.4-EVO24.2-EVO
Affected range stops below 21.2R3-S9-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R3-S10-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R3-S6-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.4R3-S6-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.2R2-S3-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.4R2-S4-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 24.2R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

5.5MEDIUMjuniper
Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-755

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card