CVE-2025-25264

Overly Permissive CORS Policy in WAGO Device Manager

MEDIUM
6.5
CVSS Score
Published: June 16, 2025 at 09:45 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 09:00 AM UTC
7 products affected across 1 vendorPFC200PFC100Touch Panel 600-standard

Using CC100 0751-9x01 by WAGO?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect CC100 0751-9x01 - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM6.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.4%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

An unauthenticated remote attacker can take advantage of the current overly permissive CORS policy to gain access and read the responses, potentially exposing sensitive data or enabling further attacks.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (700.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (FW29)0.0.0
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (70, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (FW29), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (70)0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (FW29)0.0.0
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (70), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (FW29), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (70)0.0.0 ≤ v < 3.10.11 (FW22 Patch 2)0.0.0
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (70), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.10.11 (FW22 Patch 2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (70)0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (FW29)0.0.0 ≤ v < 3.10.11 (FW22 Patch 2)0.0.0
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (70), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (FW29), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.10.11 (FW22 Patch 2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (70)0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (FW29)0.0.0
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (70), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (FW29), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (70)0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (FW29)0.0.0
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (70), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (FW29), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (70)0.0.0 ≤ v < 04.07.01 (FW29)0.0.0
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (70), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 04.07.01 (FW29), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

6.5MEDIUMCERTVDE
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
REQUIRED
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED
CWE
CWE-942

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card