CVE-2025-23367

Org.wildfly.core:wildfly-server: wildfly improper rbac permission

MEDIUM
6.5
CVSS Score
Published: January 30, 2025 at 02:30 PM UTC
Updated: September 18, 2026 at 12:16 AM UTC
3 products affected across 1 vendorJBoss Enterprise Application PlatformWildFlyData Grid

Using N/A by N/A?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect N/A - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM6.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.8%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A flaw was found in the Wildfly Server Role Based Access Control (RBAC) provider. When authorization to control management operations is secured using the Role Based Access Control provider, a user without the required privileges can suspend or resume the server. A user with a Monitor or Auditor role is supposed to have only read access permissions and should not be able to suspend the server. The vulnerability is caused by the Suspend and Resume handlers not performing authorization checks to validate whether the current user has the required permissions to proceed with the action.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

7.4 ≤ v < 7.4.218.0.0 ≤ v < 8.0.7
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:1.0.4-3.redhat_00004.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:1.0.4-3.redhat_00004.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:1.80.0-1.redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:1.80.0-1.redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:2.16.1-1.redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:2.16.1-1.redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:2.2.9-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:2.2.9-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:3.0.1-1.redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:3.0.1-1.redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:3.0.13-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:3.0.13-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:3.1.10-1.redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:3.1.10-1.redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:4.0.11-1.redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:4.0.11-1.redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:4.1.119-1.Final_redhat_00004.1.el7eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:4.1.119-1.Final_redhat_00004.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:4.1.119-1.Final_redhat_00004.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:5.1.5-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:5.1.5-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:6.2.35-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:6.2.35-1.Final_redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:7.4.21-3.GA_29548_redhat_00001.1.el7eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:7.4.21-3.GA_29548_redhat_00001.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:7.4.21-3.GA_29548_redhat_00001.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:8.0.7-3.GA_redhat_00004.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:8.0.7-3.GA_redhat_00004.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:800.7.0-2.GA_redhat_00002.1.el8eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0:800.7.0-2.GA_redhat_00002.1.el9eap (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 15.0.42.Final-redhat-1 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 15.0.45.Final-redhat-1 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 7.4.21, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 8.0 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 8.0.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 27.0.128.0.0 beta1
Affected range stops below 27.0.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

References (9)

Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATIssue Tracking
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3467
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATIssue Tracking
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3989
VDB Entryx_refsource_REDHATVendor Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23367
Issue Trackingx_refsource_REDHATVendor Advisory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337620
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT
Source: cverecord
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3990
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT
Source: cverecord
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3992

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

6.5MEDIUMredhat
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-284NVD-CWE-noinfo

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card