CVE-2025-20321

Membership State Change in Splunk Search Head Cluster through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Splunk Enterprise

MEDIUM
4.3
CVSS Score
Published: July 7, 2025 at 05:48 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 08:41 AM UTC
2 products affected across 1 vendorSplunkSplunk Cloud Platform

Using Splunk Enterprise by Splunk?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Splunk Enterprise - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.3
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.3, 9.3.5, 9.2.7 and 9.1.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.104, 9.3.2408.114, and 9.2.2406.119, an unauthenticated attacker can send a specially-crafted SPL search that could change the membership state in a Splunk Search Head Cluster (SHC) through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), potentially leading to the removal of the captain or a member of the SHC.<br><br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the administrator-level victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

9.1 ≤ v < 9.1.109.1.0 ≤ v < 9.1.109.2 ≤ v < 9.2.79.2.0 ≤ v < 9.2.79.2.2406 ≤ v < 9.2.2406.1199.3 ≤ v < 9.3.59.3.0 ≤ v < 9.3.59.3.2408 ≤ v < 9.3.2408.1149.3.2411 ≤ v < 9.3.2411.1049.4 ≤ v < 9.4.39.4.0 ≤ v < 9.4.39.19.29.2.24069.39.3.24089.3.24119.4
Affected range stops below 9.1.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.2.2406.119, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.2.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.2408.114, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.2411.104, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.4.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
9.2.2406 ≤ v < 9.2.2406.1199.3.2408 ≤ v < 9.3.2408.1149.3.2411 ≤ v < 9.3.2411.1049.2.24069.3.24089.3.2411
Affected range stops below 9.2.2406.119, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.2408.114, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.2411.104, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
REQUIRED
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
LOW
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-352

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card