CVE-2025-20300

Improper Access Control Lets Low-Privilege Users Suppress Read-Only Alerts in Splunk Enterprise

MEDIUM
4.3
CVSS Score
Published: July 7, 2025 at 05:47 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 08:41 AM UTC
2 products affected across 1 vendorSplunkSplunk Cloud Platform

Using Splunk Enterprise by Splunk?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Splunk Enterprise - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.3
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.2, 9.3.5, 9.2.6, and 9.1.9 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.103, 9.3.2408.112, and 9.2.2406.119, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles, and has read-only access to a specific alert, could suppress that alert when it triggers. See [Define alert suppression groups to throttle sets of similar alerts](https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/alert-and-respond/alerting-manual/9.4/manage-alert-trigger-conditions-and-throttling/define-alert-suppression-groups-to-throttle-sets-of-similar-alerts).

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

9.1 ≤ v < 9.1.99.1.0 ≤ v < 9.1.99.2 ≤ v < 9.2.69.2.0 ≤ v < 9.2.69.3 ≤ v < 9.3.59.3.0 ≤ v < 9.3.59.4 ≤ v < 9.4.29.4.0 ≤ v < 9.4.29.19.29.39.4
Affected range stops below 9.1.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.2.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.4.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
9.2.2406 ≤ v < 9.2.2406.1189.2.2406 ≤ v < 9.2.2406.1199.3.2408 ≤ v < 9.3.2408.1129.3.2411 ≤ v < 9.3.2411.1039.2.24069.3.24089.3.2411
Affected range stops below 9.2.2406.118, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.2.2406.119, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.2408.112, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.3.2411.103, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

4.3MEDIUMcisco
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-863

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card