CVE-2024-7481

Improper signature verification of Printer driver installation in TeamViewer Remote Clients

HIGH
8.8
CVSS Score
Published: September 25, 2024 at 10:33 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 08:20 AM UTC
3 products affected across 1 vendorFull ClientHostRemote

Using Remote Full Client by TeamViewer?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Remote Full Client - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Improper verification of cryptographic signature during installation of a Printer driver via the TeamViewer_service.exe component of TeamViewer Remote Clients prior version 15.58.4 for Windows allows an attacker with local unprivileged access on a Windows system to elevate their privileges and install drivers.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

11.0.0 ≤ v < 11.0.25931112.0.0 ≤ v < 12.0.25931213.0.0 ≤ v < 13.2.3622514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.7.4879615.0.0 ≤ v < 15.58.411.0.012.0.013.0.014.0.015.0.0
Affected range stops below 11.0.259311, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.0.259312, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.2.36225, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.7.48796, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.58.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.0.0 ≤ v < 11.0.25931112.0.0 ≤ v < 12.0.25931213.0.0 ≤ v < 13.2.3622514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.7.4879615.0.0 ≤ v < 15.58.411.0.012.0.013.0.014.0.015.0.0
Affected range stops below 11.0.259311, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.0.259312, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.2.36225, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.7.48796, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.58.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.0.0 ≤ v < 11.0.25931112.0.0 ≤ v < 12.0.25931213.0.0 ≤ v < 13.2.3622514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.7.4879615.0.0 ≤ v < 15.58.411.0.012.0.013.0.014.0.015.0.0
Affected range stops below 11.0.259311, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.0.259312, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.2.36225, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.7.48796, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.58.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

8.8HIGHTV
Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
CHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED
CWE
CWE-347

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card