CVE-2024-7254

Stack overflow in Protocol Buffers Java Lite

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: September 19, 2024 at 12:18 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 08:19 AM UTC
10 products affected across 3 vendorsActive IQ Unified ManagerOntap ToolsBluexp

Using Protocol Buffers by Google?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Protocol Buffers - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Any project that parses untrusted Protocol Buffers data containing an arbitrary number of nested groups / series of SGROUP tags can corrupted by exceeding the stack limit i.e. StackOverflow. Parsing nested groups as unknown fields with DiscardUnknownFieldsParser or Java Protobuf Lite parser, or against Protobuf map fields, creates unbounded recursions that can be abused by an attacker.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 28.2v < 3.25.54.0.0 ≤ v < 4.27.54.28.0 ≤ v < 4.28.2
Affected range stops below 28.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.25.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.27.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.28.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 3.25.5v < 4.27.5v < 4.28.24.0.0 ≤ v < 4.27.54.28.0 ≤ v < 4.28.2
Affected range stops below 3.25.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.27.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.28.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 3.25.5v < 4.27.5v < 4.28.24.0.0 ≤ v < 4.27.54.28.0 ≤ v < 4.28.2
Affected range stops below 3.25.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.27.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.28.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 3.25.5v < 4.27.5v < 4.28.24.0.0 ≤ v < 4.27.54.28.0 ≤ v < 4.28.2
Affected range stops below 3.25.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.27.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.28.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 3.25.5v < 4.27.5v < 4.28.24.0.0 ≤ v < 4.27.54.27 ≤ v < 4.27.54.28 ≤ v < 4.28.24.28.0 ≤ v ≤ 4.28.24.274.28
Affected range stops below 3.25.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.27.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.28.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
All versions
v < 3.25.5v < 4.27.5v < 4.28.2
Affected range stops below 3.25.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.27.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.28.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (3)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-400CWE-674CWE-787

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card