CVE-2024-56655

netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu

MEDIUM
5.5
CVSS Score
Published: December 27, 2024 at 03:06 PM UTC
Updated: August 5, 2026 at 12:44 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: do not defer rule destruction via call_rcu nf_tables_chain_destroy can sleep, it can't be used from call_rcu callbacks. Moreover, nf_tables_rule_release() is only safe for error unwinding, while transaction mutex is held and the to-be-desroyed rule was not exposed to either dataplane or dumps, as it deactives+frees without the required synchronize_rcu() in-between. nft_rule_expr_deactivate() callbacks will change ->use counters of other chains/sets, see e.g. nft_lookup .deactivate callback, these must be serialized via transaction mutex. Also add a few lockdep asserts to make this more explicit. Calling synchronize_rcu() isn't ideal, but fixing this without is hard and way more intrusive. As-is, we can get: WARNING: .. net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:5515 nft_set_destroy+0x.. Workqueue: events nf_tables_trans_destroy_work RIP: 0010:nft_set_destroy+0x3fe/0x5c0 Call Trace: <TASK> nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x6b7/0xad0 process_one_work+0x64a/0xce0 worker_thread+0x613/0x10d0 In case the synchronize_rcu becomes an issue, we can explore alternatives. One way would be to allocate nft_trans_rule objects + one nft_trans_chain object, deactivate the rules + the chain and then defer the freeing to the nft destroy workqueue. We'd still need to keep the synchronize_rcu path as a fallback to handle -ENOMEM corner cases though.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v ≥ 6.11.86.11.8 ≤ v < 6.126.11.8 ≤ v < 6.12.66.12 ≤ v < 6.12.66.12 ≤ v < 6.136.6.61 ≤ v < 6.6.67558f503f707f481bbf40efa74a938b8021df841d6.11.86.13 rc16.13 rc26.6.619eee6097ffb26cdd2adb988c0d378fa0d650c737a394c160d57f4b083bd904a22802f6fb7f5b3ceabfd05c68e4c6320304e9f371ffa356b6e4b9cc53c03d278fdf35e73dd0ec543b9b556876b9d9a8dccb401e5799e0acacb405f2128097e9c4ccf82f8ae6c32a64d61184c2bdf89442b3d31ef530afba34
Vendor states this is fixed in 27f0574253f6c24c8ee4e3f0a685b75ed3a256ed (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 2991dc357a28b61c13ed1f7b59e9251e2b4562fb (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5146c27b2780aac59876a887a5f4e793b8949862 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 7cf0bd232b565d9852cb25fd094f77254773e048 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in b04df3da1b5c6f6dc7cdccc37941740c078c4043 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in b0f013bebf94fe7ae75e5a53be2f2bd1cc1841e3 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in b8d8f53e1858178882b881b8c09f94ef0e83bf76 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12.6 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.13 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.67 (unaffected)

References (7)

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
NVD-CWE-noinfo

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card