CVE-2024-50010

exec: don't WARN for racy path_noexec check

MEDIUM
4.7
CVSS Score
Published: October 21, 2024 at 06:54 PM UTC
Updated: October 15, 2026 at 01:19 AM UTC
2 products affected across 2 vendorsLinux KernelSIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.7
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exec: don't WARN for racy path_noexec check Both i_mode and noexec checks wrapped in WARN_ON stem from an artifact of the previous implementation. They used to legitimately check for the condition, but that got moved up in two commits: 633fb6ac3980 ("exec: move S_ISREG() check earlier") 0fd338b2d2cd ("exec: move path_noexec() check earlier") Instead of being removed said checks are WARN_ON'ed instead, which has some debug value. However, the spurious path_noexec check is racy, resulting in unwarranted warnings should someone race with setting the noexec flag. One can note there is more to perm-checking whether execve is allowed and none of the conditions are guaranteed to still hold after they were tested for. Additionally this does not validate whether the code path did any perm checking to begin with -- it will pass if the inode happens to be regular. Keep the redundant path_noexec() check even though it's mindless nonsense checking for guarantee that isn't given so drop the WARN. Reword the commentary and do small tidy ups while here. [brauner: keep redundant path_noexec() check]

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 6.11.30fd338b2d2cdf827091ae819ae90ad760b94ad0c5.9
Vendor states this is fixed in 0bdf77be2330062b3a64f2bec39f62ab874a6796 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0d16f53c91111cec914f0811fcc526a2ba77b20d (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 0d196e7589cefe207d5d41f37a0a28a1fdeeb7c6 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in b723f96407a0a078cf75970e4dbf16b46d286a61 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in c9b77438077d5a20c79ead95bcdaf9bd4797baaf (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.229 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.170 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.9 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.115 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 6.11.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.12 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.59 (unaffected)

References (8)

Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0bdf77be2330062b3a64f2bec39f62ab874a6796
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d16f53c91111cec914f0811fcc526a2ba77b20d
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d196e7589cefe207d5d41f37a0a28a1fdeeb7c6
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b723f96407a0a078cf75970e4dbf16b46d286a61
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html
Source: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html
Source: 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
HIGH
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
NVD-CWE-noinfo

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card