CVE-2024-45324

HIGH
7.2
CVSS Score
Published: March 11, 2025 at 02:54 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 07:54 AM UTC
5 products affected across 1 vendorFortiOSFortiProxyFortiWeb

Using FortiPAM by Fortinet?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect FortiPAM - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.2
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.7%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability [CWE-134] in FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, version 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, version 7.0.0 through 7.0.15 and before 6.4.15, FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, version 7.2.0 through 7.2.12 and before 7.0.19, FortiPAM version 1.4.0 through 1.4.2 and before 1.3.1, FortiSRA version 1.4.0 through 1.4.2 and before 1.3.1 and FortiWeb version 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, version 7.2.0 through 7.2.10 and before 7.0.10 allows a privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS commands.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 6.2.17, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.4.16, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0.16, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.2.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.4.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
1.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 1.0.31.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 1.3.11.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 1.1.21.3.0 ≤ v ≤ 1.3.11.4.0 ≤ v ≤ 1.4.21.4.0 ≤ v < 1.4.31.0.01.0.11.0.21.0.31.1.01.1.11.1.21.2.01.3.01.3.11.4.01.4.11.4.2
Affected range stops below 1.4.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0.20, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.2.13, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.4.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
1.4.0 ≤ v ≤ 1.4.21.4.0 ≤ v < 1.4.31.4.01.4.11.4.2
Affected range stops below 1.4.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
7.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 7.0.107.0.0 ≤ v < 7.0.117.2.0 ≤ v ≤ 7.2.107.2.0 ≤ v < 7.2.117.4.0 ≤ v ≤ 7.4.57.4.0 ≤ v < 7.4.67.0.07.0.17.0.107.0.27.0.37.0.47.0.57.0.67.0.77.0.87.0.97.2.07.2.17.2.107.2.27.2.37.2.47.2.57.2.67.2.77.2.87.2.97.4.07.4.17.4.27.4.37.4.47.4.57.6.0
Affected range stops below 7.0.11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.2.11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.4.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
HIGH
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-134

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card