CVE-2024-40917

memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES

MEDIUM
5.5
CVSS Score
Published: July 12, 2024 at 12:25 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 07:46 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES On an (old) x86 system with SRAT just covering space above 4Gb: ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0xfffffffff] hotplug the commit referenced below leads to this NUMA configuration no longer being refused by a CONFIG_NUMA=y kernel (previously NUMA: nodes only cover 6144MB of your 8185MB e820 RAM. Not used. No NUMA configuration found Faking a node at [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000027fffffff] was seen in the log directly after the message quoted above), because of memblock_validate_numa_coverage() checking for NUMA_NO_NODE (only). This in turn led to memblock_alloc_range_nid()'s warning about MAX_NUMNODES triggering, followed by a NULL deref in memmap_init() when trying to access node 64's (NODE_SHIFT=6) node data. To compensate said change, make memblock_set_node() warn on and adjust a passed in value of MAX_NUMNODES, just like various other functions already do.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

6.6.70 ≤ v < 6.6.726.8 ≤ v < 6.106.8 ≤ v < 6.9.66.10 rc16.10 rc26.10 rc36.6.706.86fdc770506eb8379bf68a49d4e193c8364ac64e0ff6c3d81f2e86b63a3a530683f89ef393882782a
Vendor states this is fixed in 22f742b8f738918f683198a18ec3c691acda14c4 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 4ddb7f966f3d06fcf1ba5ee298af6714b593584b (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in e0eec24e2e199873f43df99ec39773ad3af2bff7 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.10 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.72 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.8 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.9.6 (unaffected)

References (3)

Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22f742b8f738918f683198a18ec3c691acda14c4
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4ddb7f966f3d06fcf1ba5ee298af6714b593584b
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0eec24e2e199873f43df99ec39773ad3af2bff7

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
NVD-CWE-noinfo

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card