CVE-2024-39542

Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A malformed CFM packet or specific transit traffic leads to FPC crash

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: July 11, 2024 at 04:17 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 07:42 AM UTC
3 products affected across 2 vendorsJunosJunos OS EvolvedJunos OS Evolved

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.5%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MPC10/11 or LC9600, MX304, and Junos OS Evolved on ACX Series and PTX Series allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). This issue can occur in two scenarios: 1. If a device, which is configured with SFLOW and ECMP, receives specific valid transit traffic, which is subject to sampling, the packetio process crashes, which in turn leads to an evo-aftman crash and causes the FPC to stop working until it is restarted. (This scenario is only applicable to PTX but not to ACX or MX.) 2. If a device receives a malformed CFM packet on an interface configured with CFM, the packetio process crashes, which in turn leads to an evo-aftman crash and causes the FPC to stop working until it is restarted. Please note that the CVSS score is for the formally more severe issue 1. The CVSS score for scenario 2. is: 6.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) This issue affects Junos OS: * All versions before 21.2R3-S4, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R2, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S2; Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R2-EVO.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 21.2r3-s8-evo, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4r2-evo, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 21.2R3-S421.4 ≤ v < 21.4R222.2 ≤ v < 22.2R2-S1, 22.2R322.2 ≤ v < 22.2r2-s122.2 ≤ v < 22.2r321.421.4 r121.4 r1-s121.4 r1-s222.222.2 r122.2 r1-s122.2 r1-s222.2 r2
Affected range stops below 21.2R3-S4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R2-S1, 22.2R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2r2-s1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2r3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 21.2R3-S8-EVO21.4 ≤ v < 21.4R2-EVO21.4
Affected range stops below 21.2R3-S8-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.5HIGHjuniper
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-1286

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card