CVE-2024-38610

drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map()

HIGH
7.8
CVSS Score
Published: June 19, 2024 at 01:56 PM UTC
Updated: August 5, 2026 at 12:04 PM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers/virt/acrn: fix PFNMAP PTE checks in acrn_vm_ram_map() Patch series "mm: follow_pte() improvements and acrn follow_pte() fixes". Patch #1 fixes a bunch of issues I spotted in the acrn driver. It compiles, that's all I know. I'll appreciate some review and testing from acrn folks. Patch #2+#3 improve follow_pte(), passing a VMA instead of the MM, adding more sanity checks, and improving the documentation. Gave it a quick test on x86-64 using VM_PAT that ends up using follow_pte(). This patch (of 3): We currently miss handling various cases, resulting in a dangerous follow_pte() (previously follow_pfn()) usage. (1) We're not checking PTE write permissions. Maybe we should simply always require pte_write() like we do for pin_user_pages_fast(FOLL_WRITE)? Hard to tell, so let's check for ACRN_MEM_ACCESS_WRITE for now. (2) We're not rejecting refcounted pages. As we are not using MMU notifiers, messing with refcounted pages is dangerous and can result in use-after-free. Let's make sure to reject them. (3) We are only looking at the first PTE of a bigger range. We only lookup a single PTE, but memmap->len may span a larger area. Let's loop over all involved PTEs and make sure the PFN range is actually contiguous. Reject everything else: it couldn't have worked either way, and rather made use access PFNs we shouldn't be accessing.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v ≥ 5.16.19v ≥ 5.17.25.15.33 ≤ v < 5.15.1615.16.19 ≤ v < 5.175.17.2 ≤ v < 5.185.17.2 ≤ v < 6.1.935.18 ≤ v < 6.1.935.18 ≤ v < 6.105.18 ≤ v < 6.6.335.18 ≤ v < 6.8.125.18 ≤ v < 6.9.36.2 ≤ v < 6.6.336.7 ≤ v < 6.8.126.9 ≤ v < 6.9.3149d5fb7e0124c3763e92edd1fde19417f4d2d092098ac42b7ff55ec72cd83ee1eb0a23481a195.15.335.16.195.17.25.188a6e85f75a83d16a71077e41f2720c691f432002b9c43aa0b18da5619aac347d54cb67fe30d1f884
Vendor states this is fixed in 2c8d6e24930b8ef7d4a81787627c559ae0e0d3bb (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 3d6586008f7b638f91f3332602592caa8b00b559 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 4c4ba3cf3a15ccfbaf787d0296fa42cdb00da9b4 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5c6705aa47b5b78d7ad36fea832bb69caa5bf49a (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in afeb0e69627695f759fc73c39c1640dbf8649b32 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in e873f36ec890bece26ecce850e969917bceebbb6 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.161 (unaffected)
Affected range stops below 5.17, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.18 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.93 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.10 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.6.33 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.8.12 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.9.3 (unaffected)

References (6)

Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c8d6e24930b8ef7d4a81787627c559ae0e0d3bb
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d6586008f7b638f91f3332602592caa8b00b559
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c4ba3cf3a15ccfbaf787d0296fa42cdb00da9b4
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c6705aa47b5b78d7ad36fea832bb69caa5bf49a
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/afeb0e69627695f759fc73c39c1640dbf8649b32
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e873f36ec890bece26ecce850e969917bceebbb6

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.8HIGHLinux
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-416

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card